Answer:
1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).
2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.
3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.
4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.
5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).
The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.
Explanation:
ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
One reason conquistadors failed to establish colonies is that the Natives kicked them out. Many of the aboriginal people were very powerful and could easily get rid of the conquistadors.
Conquistadors could also run out of resources. Nothing lasts forever, and if they couldn't obtain enough resources while exploring and settling it would be hard to establish a colony easily.
There could also be dangerous things that could hinder the settlements such as wild beasts, natural events, and diseases.
Have a wonderful day! :D
Farming <span>enabled American Indians to settle in permanent villages.</span>
Answer:
a constitutional right to reject a decision or proposal made by a law-making body.
Explanation:
the power to say no to a bill becoming law
Answer:
In 1754 Washington's surprise attack upon a small French force at Jumonville Glen and his subsequent surrender Explanation:
