1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
9

What feature does this building have that tells you it's a roman design

History
1 answer:
Lady bird [3.3K]3 years ago
3 0
The pillars windows and the curved wall
You might be interested in
What was one effect of the Hartford?
professor190 [17]

D it recognized Connecticut’s opposition to the war of 1812

5 0
3 years ago
Which is true about democracy after WWII?
ollegr [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The US was the leader in decomcracy, which led to the Cold War

6 0
3 years ago
What can modern nations learn from the Ming Dynasty?<br> 5-8 sentences
Orlov [11]
Do not drink mercury .
Walls are effective .
Guns are better than swords. Fireworks are cool , and can be made into bombs .
A president is better than a royal family .
7 0
3 years ago
22
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

The church of St Cyriakus

Explanation:

The pictured church is that of Saint Cyriakus, located in Gernrode,  Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, and is an example of Ottonian architecture. It was built by Margrave Gero sometime in 959 and restored in the 1900s.

This church and the abbey were the foremost church in Gernrode until 1614 when it became a Protestant church.

Presently, it is a large tourist attraction along the Romanesque Road and is a good example of Ottonian architecture.

8 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is the royal brute
    10·2 answers
  • Hich of the following reforms was advocated by Theodore Roosevelt and later established by Taft?
    14·1 answer
  • Who is the inventor of the steel manufacturer
    15·1 answer
  • What was the result of the trinity test in 1945? Scientists persuaded the us to use the bomb on germany. Japan was convinced to
    12·2 answers
  • In Texas, how were Mexicans and Mexican Americans specifically affected by the Great Depression? Check all that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • Define infrastructure
    15·1 answer
  • Other than economic issues, why did Spain and Portugal colonize Latin America in the 16th Century?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did a nationalist movement grow in Persia<br> after World War 1?
    10·2 answers
  • 12. "Jim Crow" was--*
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me out with this lol
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!