1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
3 years ago
6

In 1895, the first Putting Green Championship was held. The winner’s prize money was $170. In 2016, the winner’s check was $1,39

0,000.a.What was the percentage increase per year in the winner’s check over this period? (Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)b. If the winner’s prize increases at the same rate, what will it be in 2046? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Business
1 answer:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. The percentage increase per year in the winner’s check over this period was 7,73%

b. The winners prize at 2046 will be $12,975,215,98

Explanation:

a.

\sqrt[(2016-1895)]{(1390000/170)}

\sqrt[121]{8176,47}

0.0772965

b.

FC=IC*(1+0,0773)^{30}

FC=1,390,000*(1+0,0773)^{30}

You might be interested in
An all-equity firm is considering the following projects:
FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

Projects Y and Z

b. Projects W and Z

c. Projects W and Y

Explanation:

CAPM equation : Expected return = Risk free rate + Beta x (Expected market return - Risk free rate)

W = 4% + [0.85 x (11% - 4%)] = 9.95%

X = 4% + (0.92 x 7%) = 10.44%

Y = 4% + (1.09 x 7%) = 11.63%

Z = 4% + (1.35 x 7%) = 13.45%

Projects Y and Z have an expected return greater than 11%

b. Projects W and Z should be accepted because its expected return is higher than the IRR

c. Project W would be incorrectly rejected because the expected rate of return is less than the overall cost of capital (i.e. 9.95 is less than 11). But its expected rate of return is greater than the IRR

Y would be incorrectly accepted because its expected rate of return is greater  than the overall cost of capital but its expected rate of return is less than the IRR

4 0
3 years ago
Scenario
liubo4ka [24]

Yes I believe your scenario is correct

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Q1. SISKO & Co. Ltd commences business and issues one million shares with a nominal value of Le3 each. The company allows it
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

SISKO & Co. Ltd.

1. The paid-up share capital is:

A. Le1.25 million

2. Current Ratio will be:

(B) 3:1

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Issued share capital = 1,000,000 shares

Allotment = Le1.25 per share

Paid-up share capital = Le1.25 million (Le1.25 * 1,000,000)

Current Ratio:

Cash Balance                  Le15,000

Trade Receivables         Le35,000

Inventory                        Le40,000

Total current assets      Le90,000

Current liabilities:

Trade Payables             Le24,000

Bank Overdraft               Le6,000

Total current liabilities Le30,000

Current ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities

= Le90,000/Le30,000

= 3:1

8 0
3 years ago
Do you think it’s ethical for a general partnership to fire a partner by dissolving the partnership and then re-forming without
Bond [772]

Answer:

The answer to this question is, it depends on the motive for the dissolution.

Explanation:

Partnerships can be very rewarding. Yet they are the most unstable of all the legal personalities which can be created for the purpose of for-profit operations or not-for-profit operations.

The dissolution of a partnership can happen for any of the following reasons:

  • Bankruptcy
  • Change in business practices  
  • Death
  • Partner negligence
  • Poor cash flow and  
  • Retirement

If a person maliciously deploys any of the scenarios as an excuse to dissolve the partnership, then it becomes unethical. This, of course is difficult to prove. A very unethical case would be to dissolve a partnership a partnership, make away with business secrets to start another. If this is discovered and can be proven, the aggrieved party may seek redress in the law court.

Cheers

3 0
3 years ago
Alvin's credit card charges him 18% interest on his unpaid balance. His bank is offering him 1% interest on a savings account. T
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

Alvin should pay off the unpaid money.

Explanation:

The Alvin should pay off the balance of credit card with his extra money because the interest rate charged by the bank on the unpaid balance is very high (18 %) and the interest rate on saving is 1 % which is very low. If the unpaid balance will not be paid then Alvin’s extra money will go into the payment of interest rate. So, at first thing he should pay off the unpaid money.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Stockholders' equity is generally classified into two major categories:
    15·1 answer
  • If
    8·1 answer
  • Crew Clothing (CC) sells women’s resort casual clothing to high-end department stores and in its own retail boutiques. CC expect
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms refers to an arrangement by an employer to have another firm make goods or perform work that could
    8·1 answer
  • The following information is available for Concord Corporation and Skysong, Inc.: (in millions) Concord Corporation Skysong, Inc
    5·1 answer
  • A. using the data under d1 and d2, calculate the cross elasticity of lorena's demand for golf at all three prices. (to do this,
    15·1 answer
  • How can entrepreneurs save money in case the government increases taxes on small businesses?
    13·1 answer
  • How do lines 345-365 illustrate the Cyclops’ societal failure?
    11·1 answer
  • You were charged interest of $6.31 for Purchases (near section 8). Why?<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • What is one direct result of competition in a free-market economy?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!