Answer:
Projects Y and Z
b. Projects W and Z
c. Projects W and Y
Explanation:
CAPM equation : Expected return = Risk free rate + Beta x (Expected market return - Risk free rate)
W = 4% + [0.85 x (11% - 4%)] = 9.95%
X = 4% + (0.92 x 7%) = 10.44%
Y = 4% + (1.09 x 7%) = 11.63%
Z = 4% + (1.35 x 7%) = 13.45%
Projects Y and Z have an expected return greater than 11%
b. Projects W and Z should be accepted because its expected return is higher than the IRR
c. Project W would be incorrectly rejected because the expected rate of return is less than the overall cost of capital (i.e. 9.95 is less than 11). But its expected rate of return is greater than the IRR
Y would be incorrectly accepted because its expected rate of return is greater than the overall cost of capital but its expected rate of return is less than the IRR
Yes I believe your scenario is correct
Answer:
SISKO & Co. Ltd.
1. The paid-up share capital is:
A. Le1.25 million
2. Current Ratio will be:
(B) 3:1
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Issued share capital = 1,000,000 shares
Allotment = Le1.25 per share
Paid-up share capital = Le1.25 million (Le1.25 * 1,000,000)
Current Ratio:
Cash Balance Le15,000
Trade Receivables Le35,000
Inventory Le40,000
Total current assets Le90,000
Current liabilities:
Trade Payables Le24,000
Bank Overdraft Le6,000
Total current liabilities Le30,000
Current ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities
= Le90,000/Le30,000
= 3:1
Answer:
The answer to this question is, it depends on the motive for the dissolution.
Explanation:
Partnerships can be very rewarding. Yet they are the most unstable of all the legal personalities which can be created for the purpose of for-profit operations or not-for-profit operations.
The dissolution of a partnership can happen for any of the following reasons:
- Bankruptcy
- Change in business practices
- Death
- Partner negligence
- Poor cash flow and
- Retirement
If a person maliciously deploys any of the scenarios as an excuse to dissolve the partnership, then it becomes unethical. This, of course is difficult to prove. A very unethical case would be to dissolve a partnership a partnership, make away with business secrets to start another. If this is discovered and can be proven, the aggrieved party may seek redress in the law court.
Cheers
Answer:
Alvin should pay off the unpaid money.
Explanation:
The Alvin should pay off the balance of credit card with his extra money because the interest rate charged by the bank on the unpaid balance is very high (18 %) and the interest rate on saving is 1 % which is very low. If the unpaid balance will not be paid then Alvin’s extra money will go into the payment of interest rate. So, at first thing he should pay off the unpaid money.