Answer:
A). The demand curve looked by the flawlessly serious firms are splendidly versatile this is a result of the items selling in the ideal rivalry. The items are indistinguishable so no firm has power over the market cost, in the event that one firm builds the cost of the item the purchasers will quickly move to the result of different firms on the grounds that the items are indistinguishable. No firm has the motivator lessen the cost of their item. So the interest bend would be a level straight line corresponding to the X pivot, this demonstrates the interest is splendidly versatile. A cost increment will bring the amount requested to zero.
B). The monopolists is just the single vendor in the market, so he can charge any value he needs, yet the amount requested will be relied on the value he charges. For instance in the event that he charges a significant expense the amount demanded will be very less and the other way around. So the monopolist is capable sell more at lower costs just, the descending inclining request bend shows the negative connection between the cost and the amount requested.
C). In the ideal rivalry there is consummately flexible interest so the MR curve is likewise the interest curve of the firm. For the monopolist the MR curve lies underneath the interest curve, as the costs go bring down the MR decreases.
Answer:
a. Differential revenue = $18 per pound
Explanation:
Differential revenue refers to additional revenue per unit.
Current revenue per unit = $20 - $15.75 = $4.25 per unit on Product J
When it will be further processed to form Product D
Net proceeds to be realized from each unit of product D = $38
Net revenue = $38 - $24.30 = $13.7
Additional or differential revenue = $38 - $20 = $18 per unit
As for $20 selling price the revenue was recognized earlier now additional revenue = $38 - $20 = $18 per pound
Note: Revenue is the proceeds from sale and not the net profit.
Differential revenue = $18 per pound
Answer:
$142,050 is what all of her total assets are worth. If you understand the difference between liabilities and assets theses questions are incredibly easy!
Explanation:
Equilibrium is the intersect of the two curves. The curves show you how much the producers supply and how much the consumers demand at each possible price.
The demand curves shows that the higher the price is, the less the consumers demand. That's obvious—the consumer wants something, but not at any price. He's only willing to pay so much. If the price goes higher and higher, less and less people want to buy the good.
The higher the price is, the more the producers can supply. This is because some producers are able to produce at lower costs; they're better and more efficient than other producers. Other producers, who produce at higher costs, would go bankrupt if they tried to produce at lower prices. But when the price goes up, even the worse producers, who have higher costs, are able to make profit. So, more producers supply to the market.
What happens now, when the price gets lower than the equlibrium? As you can see from the chart, producers would supply less than consumers would be willing to consume at that particular price. There would be SHORTAGE. This happens when the goverment sets price ceilings (like on gas in the 30's). An opposite situation happens when there is price floor—for example minimum wage (because wages are prices too; prices of labor). In that case, there is surplus—in case of minimum wage that means surplus of labor (unemployment).
But when the markets are free to set the price, they will quickly establish equlibrium again. The producers will see that there is a shortage. They'll realize they can set higher prices and make bigger profits. They can't set higher price than the equilibrium though, because there would be surplus and they would have their warehouses stuffed with goods noone wants to buy at that price.
This is the Answer Am 100% sure.
Maladaptive coping strategies tend to be associated with reduced adaptive capacity. Coping strategies, while helpful in the moment, are problematic in the long run. Maladaptive coping mechanisms, or maladaptive coping strategies, are methods used by people to try to reduce stress and anxiety, but they are ineffective and unhealthy.
There are two types of coping strategies in such situations: positive and negative. Maladaptive coping strategies commonly increase stress and anxiety, including self-harm, binge eating, and substance abuse. The Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior states that people struggling with addiction often struggle with the maladaptive coping strategies.
To learn more about strategies, click here.
brainly.com/question/14063180
#SPJ4
