Answer:
13 ; 17
Explanation:
Adolescents Romantic Relationships: Usually, younger people value trust, closeness, and support more than adults which they experience and feel in romantic relationships. Teenagers have more conflicts and issues with their peers and parents rather than with their romantic partners, nonetheless, conflict or issues within the romantic relationships increases with increase in age. A healthy relationship can improve social skills and knowledge.
ANSWER: Yes the president nominates someone for a vacancy on the grout and the senate votes to confirm the person(nominee)
Answer:
personality
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of Sondra's behavior being influenced by personality. Personality is individual differences in characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. Shyness is part of a person's personality and usually leads to not wanting to be around people including not liking speaking in front of crowds.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Bonds
IOUs from government - buy a piece of paper from government with promised interest rate - money goes to help government with task or project - most famous ones are for war.
Reserves
what the bank holds on to - does not loan out
Creditworthy
deemed acceptable by bankers - viewed as low risk in borrowing money.
Risk
chance you take that investment will or will not work out; also can be chance you take in anything like possibility of being injured or getting sick.
Claim
when you explain to insurance company about what happened
Premium
Monthly payment to have insurance coverage
Purchasing Power
strength or value of money - affects how much you can buy
Credit
act of or status from borrowing money or taking out loan from financial institution (not from friends or family)
Portfolio
list of investments
Installment Plan
breaking something into multiple payments so that large sum not due at once
Mutual Funds
money pooled or collected from multiple investors to purchase securities or investments
Insurance
coverage for 'what if' - helps split risks among multiple people
Deductible
what must be paid out of pocket before insurance company will cover costs.
Credit Union
non-profit member run financial institution
Interest
percentage charged on top of a loan
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
