D. It did not allow for a centralized government
Answer:
stop being so judgmental and getting along with our differences.
The correct answer is B) an attempt to address the problems associated with the Gilded Age.
The statement that best describes the Progressive movement is "an attempt to address the problems associated with the Gilded Age.
The Gilded Age in the United States represented a period of economic growth of the big business, but with a lot of corruption practices by companies and the government. Furthermore, there were some problems that the country lived as a consequence of the Industrial Revolution. Well, the Progressive movement joined people that wanted to create reforms and were activists that demanded the end of corruption practices in America. The movement started in 1890 and ended in 1920.
Answer:
Symbolic representation
Explanation:
Symbolic representation involves the legislature representing the values of the constituent which he/she represents such as their dressing style or favorite local sport teams, this may include the use of symbols such as the t-shirt of the local sport team of his/her constituency.
In 1984, many incumbent Democratic judges lost their seats in large urban counties to unknown Republican challengers because of "straight ticket voting".
<u>Answer:</u> Option a
<u>Explanation:</u>
“Straight-ticket voting” is when voters give all their votes to representative of one political party which is just reverse of “Split-ticket voting” where voters vote for multiple parties in an election. Therefore it is viewed as alternative to straight-ticket voting.
In 1984 election following are the factors which resulted into loss for Democratic judges due to straight-ticket voting :
- Only when the disparity between the straight party vote for the two parties widened was the effect of straight party vote on candidate success considerable.
- The variation between the two parties in direct party voting forces the candidate of the minority party to pursue independent voters aggressively.
- A particularly strong straight-for-party vote in favor of one party can make the difference with independent voters almost impossible for a judicial candidate to make up.
- The body of fully independent voters most open to judicial candidates campaign efforts is quite small.
