Answer:
trust vs. mistrust
Explanation:
Trust vs. mistrust: This is given by Erik Erikson's in his theory of psychosocial development and is the very first stage. The stage starts from the birth period of the child and lasts till twelve months. In this stage, a child believes that his or her parents or caregivers will provide and fulfill his or her basic needs.
The parent's or caregiver's quick response to the child's needs, then the child will develop the foundation of trust. If in case the needs of a child don't get fulfilled consistently a child may develop suspicion, anxiety, and mistrust.
In the question above, the primary developmental task of the stage described is trust vs. mistrust.
Literally jus research stuff about child labor in brazil and make stuff up as you go and think about stuff that you would do in a day but like replace it with child labor. like how old the child is, how long you work, how much you’re payed or if you’re payed at all
<h2>1) Participles</h2>
The word leaning is used as a Participles which is acting adjective. A participle is actually verbs that pretend to a be an adjective that describes the noun or a pronoun in a sentence.
<h2>2) Making Predictions</h2>
Is a plan for study and Science Learning for many individuals. Making predictions is a plan in which readers use data from a document. This may include headings, labels, photographs, and charts from their own particular practices to assume, what they are concerning. Whether it is to read or something that is to occurs subsequently.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
The term that is described above is irregular. This word explains things that are not exactly on point, not in position, this is used when things are not organized. The term regular on the other hand is completely opposite for they are use in defining things that are planned and more organized, things that are point and are in the exact line.
