B. Because the British did not realize that even if they had won the revolutionary war they would still have a resentful and rebellious nation that wished to be free. Patriots would rise no matter what happened, So they ignored convincing the colonists that staying with Great Britain would be the better option. Hope this helps
Senator Russ Feingold was in opposition to the Patriot Act because A. He did not think the legislation went far enough in authorizing surveillance of possible suspects.
<h3>What is Patriots Act?</h3>
It should be noted that the Patriot Act was signed by President Bush in order o tackle terrorism in the United States.
In this case, Senator Russ Feingold was in opposition to the Patriot Act because he did not think the legislation went far enough in authorizing surveillance of possible suspects.
Learn more about Patriots Act on:
brainly.com/question/414562
Answer: Ancient Egypt was divided into two kingdoms, known as Upper and Lower Egypt. The pharaohs were known as rulers of the Two Kingdoms, viz. upper and lower Egypt.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>be completely powerful</h2>
<u>Further details:</u>
Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.
Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan</em> book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:
- <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>