Answer:
[>>>>>>>..............................
If this is a multiple choice question and if i get it wrong, im sorry.
I'd guess benifit? lol
Answer:Bad debt expenses will be $2000 on the income statement and Allowance for uncollectible Accounts will be ($3000) on the balance sheet.
Explanation:
The bad debt accounts and allowance for uncollectible accounts are stated in the income and balance sheet statement respectively yearly to monitor activities on collectible debts.
A firm based on his experience determined an estimated percentage of debts outstanding for the year that are likely to go bad. If the new estimate is greater than the previous year, the difference is debited to income statement and if the new estimate is less than the previous year estimate the difference is credited to the income statement.
In the above scenario the new year estimate is greater than previous year by $ 2000 and that lead to $2000 to be debited to income statement.
The balance is made to reflect the total of the new estimate to be deducted from collectible debt and this is why ($3000) goes to the balance sheet.
Answer: This implies that the cross elasticity of demand between orange juice and apple juice is <u>0.5.</u>
Explanation:
The cross elasticity of demand is evaluated as:
Price of orange juice increased by 20 percent, which resulted in a 10 percent increase in the quantity of apple juice consumed.
The cross elasticity of demand 
The cross elasticity of demand = 0.5
Hence, This implies that the cross elasticity of demand between orange juice and apple juice is <u>0.5.</u>
Both codes incorporate the conceptual framework approach for evaluating threats when specific rules on a matter do not exist.
Explanation:
IFAC has enacted a Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), the International Ethics Standards Committee for Competent. The latest IESBA Code edition was upgraded and modified in July 2009 and comes into force on 1 January 2011. The adjustments clarified and considerably strengthened the independence specifications for all competent accountants.
IESBA and AICPA are more comparable than they are, but there are substantial differences. In many instances it will produce similar effects if codes are added to the same pattern of truth.
The IESBA Code deals with a number of possible independence issues which are covered by the AICPA Conceptual Structure but not AICPA. Examples include the Long Senior Human Resources Group (including Team Rotation).
Certain independence restrictions are enforced by the IESBA Code representing the "extent of public interest in certain companies" (i.e. entities listed on an accepted stock exchange for whose shares are listed), and institutions whose auditors are legally or administrative authorities required to comply with the same requirements for independence as the listings).
The IESBA splits the conditions for freedom into two regions. Section 290 offers the toughest prohibitions and includes accounting reports and audits. Section 291 generally provides less stringent requirements of freedom for all other insurance obligations. The AICPA does not change the principles of equality.
