Answer:
-11.8%
Explanation:
the key to answer this question is to remember that valuation of a bond depends basically of calculating the present value of a series of cash flows, so let´s think about a bond as if you were a lender so you will get interest by the money you lend (coupon) and at the end of n years you will get back the money you lend at the beginnin (principal), so applying math we have the bond value given by:

so in this particular case that one year later there are 29 years to maturity so we have:


so as we have a higher rate the investment has the next return:


Answer:
10.0 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below
We know that
Payback period = initial cost ÷ increase in net income
= $30,000 ÷ $3,000
= 10 years
As the depreciation expense is a non-cash expense so we dont considered it
Therefore the first option is correct
<span>This reduction in taxes serves as a "direct" incentive to buy a house.
</span>There are direct incentives and indirect incentives, the difference between them are;Direct incentives are generally simple to perceive/aftereffect of an activity – Firm brings down the gas cost to pull in more clients and Indirect incentives are the hidden outcome of the move made – Pollution is a result of the expanded amount requested.
None of those answers are suitable to me.
Government bonds are generally regarded as low-risk and they typically have modest (low) interest rates for return on investment, and these are advantages really. So we can discount answer A, C, and D.
I guess you could say that bonds can be hard to find (Answer B) but this not really true. There is always a bond market to trade bonds on. It requires setting up a trading account or speaking to a broker so this can be more difficult than putting money in a bank account, but to be honest I don't think any of those answers are appropriate for the question.
I believe the answer is: B.That it makes it possible for society to become better off by increasing both its production and its consumption.
Without trades, in order to fulfill all needs of the people, a country need to separate their time and resources to produce each of the needed products. With trades, a country could increase the production of the products in which they have a natural advantage at, and trade the products with other countries in case we need different product that we do not produce here.