1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gennadij [26K]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?

History
2 answers:
Aleonysh [2.5K]3 years ago
8 0

<u>Answer: </u>

Option D is correct option out of all the given options. Corroborated sources of historical evidence are the most necessary factor to validate situation or an event in history.

<u>Explanation: </u>

Historians are humans too, and they tend to use written sources as references, we all know written sources are not 100% true, audio visual materials and artifacts are very important objects that help to provide information to present historians.

Historical sources are usually classified into two subdivisions: primary and secondary sources. Depending on the historian's use or purpose, some sources move their choice.

Figuring out what type of clues to implement, and the level of truth and reliability of these sources, is an important t step in thinking for the historians which makes them quite unreliable, which also makes corroborated sources more reliable  

iragen [17]3 years ago
6 0

Option D is correct. Corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

Historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

Historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. Depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. Determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

You might be interested in
In the 1932 election, did the support for the communists (kpd) increase or decrease
stepan [7]

Answer:

increase

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
"That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illega
Nat2105 [25]
Citizens should be able to bring requests and complaints to the government.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please help me​
pashok25 [27]
The answer is C. 435
8 0
3 years ago
How did urban sprawl affect people who did own cars?
adelina 88 [10]

The answer is: B) Cars made it convenient to commute between cities and suburbs

Urban sprawl refers to the process of people moving from highly populated area into a more populated area.

Many workers in the city decided to do this by buying a house in suburban area and commute to their workplace every day.

Cars are considered to be a popular option for the to commute. If they commute by train or bus, They're restricted to a certain schedule that might not be convenience to them. Using cars enable them to commute whenever and wherever they want.

7 0
2 years ago
NEED HELP QUICK 100 PTS
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

The US were against the government of Salvador Allende in Chile because he was a Marxist and they feared this would increase the influence of communism in the Western hemisphere.  

Explanation:

The United States intervened in the presidency of Salvador Allende and supported a military coup by Augusto Pinochet, that would lead to the death of Salvador Allende and the instillation of a military dictatorship in Chile that lasted from 1974-1990.  The actions that would actively undermine the Allende government were supported by the US government and the CIA because Allende had Marxist views that when against the liberal democracy ideals of the United States government. Intervention helped assure that there would not be a further spread of communism in Latin America that could threaten the sphere of influence of the United States. I think that the United States shouldn't intervene in the sovereign systems of other countries and that the US should have faced charges of human rights violations for the death of General René Schneider who the CIA paid $50,000 to have kidnapped and delivered weapons to the pro-coup factions who were after Schneider.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is it called when the media puts a potentially negative facts in a favorable light?
    15·2 answers
  • Which invention helped spread the talian Renassance across Europe?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the United States draft men into service in World War I?
    8·2 answers
  • What types of workers were needed to build and run the railroad
    10·2 answers
  • What was the objective of Roosevelt's address?
    9·1 answer
  • Shia Muslims believe the modern-day Islamic leader
    15·2 answers
  • In the opinion of these authors one of the most important challenges of globalization has been-
    6·1 answer
  • This excerpt reinforces the idea of
    6·1 answer
  • Help please! thanks!
    7·1 answer
  • Column A
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!