Discuss the reliability of the analytical scientist in the quart room.

1 answer:

4 0

1)They are very reliable because they are almost always accurate.All science in the courtroom has to be verified in order to be used in the court to prove that their tests are accurate and reliable and can be used as an evidence in court. Reliability is measured by how much your machines have been validated ,if a forensic scientist in a court say the evidence is true but did not have a proper reliability , than people can question how true this test can actually be. Hard science is consisted of chemistry,biology and physics are the most reliable evidence.

2)The reliability of the analytical science in the courtroom is growing. This is because of the fact that analytical science involves comparison between the characteristics and features of the suspected specimens with those obtained from the criminals or victims. The analytical science plays an important role in proving a fact that a crime has been committed, the place of crime and establishing the identity of the culprit.

HOPE THIS HELPS..

You might be interested in

A homeless man in Panama City was arrested and charged with theft. He could not afford an attorney and had to go to trial withou

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

His 6th amendment right was violated. The 6th amendment states that you are guaranteed a speedy public trial, an impartial jury, and that the accused can confront witnesses against them, and that the accused must be allowed to have a lawyer, regardless of cost or social status.

6 0

2 years ago

Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shoot

balandron [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. As a leader of police officer, you have many years of policing under your belt, so with that role in mind you can establish new rules and regulations for your officers as the chief.

2. As someone who is new to the community, listening to the thoughts of the community leader will be essential to helping reduce crime and protests.

3. Gathering of evidence of the case of the police officer killing the unarmed man can 1. help determine if there really was a case of self defense or not 2. familiarizing yourself to the case more on evidence and less of word of mouth and 3. reappealing the verdict to manslaughter.

4. Establish a compromise with the community leader to address "de-policing" as unproductive counter to the rising crime rates.

5. Establish new regulations for the community leaders so no similar reoccurring incidents may repeat themselves in such turmoil.