1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlada-n [284]
3 years ago
14

Read this passage from the Bill of Rights:

Law
1 answer:
Digiron [165]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Mark me as brainlist

Explanation:

The original Constitution of 1788 contained very few specific restrictions on the ways in which the power of the national government could be exercised against the people. It guaranteed the right to trial by jury in criminal (but not civil) cases, placed limits on prosecutions and punishments for treason, forbade bills of attainder (laws aimed at particular persons) and ex post facto laws (laws that punished conduct that was legal when it happened), limited any restrictions on habeas corpus to certain designated emergencies, and prohibited the granting of titles of nobility. But the Constitution that emerged from the 1787 Constitutional Convention contained nothing like a comprehensive bill of rights. Most state constitutions of the time had bills of rights, and many citizens—and members of the Constitutional Convention—expected the new national constitution to have one as well. Nonetheless, the state delegations at the Constitutional Convention voted 10-0 against including a bill of rights in the Constitution.

You might be interested in
Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.

In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.

That's it you need to know!

Hope it helps you mate!

5 0
3 years ago
Read this statement.
elixir [45]

Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis

Explanation:

Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.

When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).

5 0
3 years ago
In 2001, about how many gigawatts of electricity in California came from burning fossil fuels?
telo118 [61]

Answer:120 gigawatts

             160 gigawatts

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I have a panel about objective law, could you please give me some facts I should know before question time?
kykrilka [37]
He said that the story of an old one he objective
7 0
3 years ago
Detective Stanton gets a tip from John Bratton’s neighbor that Bratton is dealing drugs out of his house. Detective Stanton and
netineya [11]

ANSWER: The exclusionary rule states that any evidence that is obtain illegally, (i.e without a warrant) and any statements obtained through an illegal interrogation, which violate the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, will not be an acceptable evidence at a criminal trial in the court.

This exclutionary rule applies only to criminal case and not to civil case. Because John Bratton has a murder case charge, which are the dead bodies found in his properties. John Bratton's case is a civil case, and all evidence filed with his case should be admissible in the court of law.

Sara Sutton will not be charged for illegally selling gun, but will be charged for being a sole sponsor of a civil crime case charged against Bratton. This will make Sara Sutton to be prosecuted along side with Bratton, in the case.

If Sara Sutton is charged for illegally selling of guns, it will be a criminal case which will not be admissible by the court, due to exclusionary rule, because the police got their evidence without a search warrant.

John Bratton will not be charged for drug abuse offense, which is a criminal case, because all evidence provided will not be accepted due to exclusionary rule. Stankowitcz has busted into Bratton's apartment without a search warrant.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the highest rank in police jobs?
    13·1 answer
  • Rawls and Nozick both agree that : a)the law should embody no conception of the good life b)in the name of liberty the governmen
    5·2 answers
  • Favre, Ch. 9 (Access to the Court – Standing and Legal Injury)
    10·1 answer
  • Voting laws are controlled by the us constitution and...
    12·1 answer
  • Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on H
    11·1 answer
  • If there was a robbery 4 weeks ago and the body was found yesterday, and the police just noticed. Who’s to blame for the crime??
    12·2 answers
  • Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
    8·1 answer
  • The boys are annoying and they make my blood boil.
    9·2 answers
  • Who is the father of nation in bangladesh
    9·1 answer
  • What was Preston Tucker's dream?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!