1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
umka2103 [35]
3 years ago
8

Which statement about Exodusters living in Kansas is most likely true?

History
1 answer:
Readme [11.4K]3 years ago
5 0

The Exodusters was the name given to the African American settlers who moved from the southern states that bordered the Lousiana River into the state of Kansas. The mass migration to Kansas occurred in the year 1879 after the Civil War.

Kansas proved to be an ideal location for African American migrants, as it was a free state and it offered numerous opportunities for this community to develop. Numerous African Americans left the southern states due to the oppression from groups such as the "White League".

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast the development of the Chesapeake and New England colonies, and account for why the major differences in de
shutvik [7]

Answer:

In both the New England and Chesapeake regions, English colonists established settler colonies based on agriculture, in contrast to French trading posts in Canada. These settlements were based on some form of agriculture and had some measure of self-sufficiency, especially in New England. For example, permanent settlements were established at both Jamestown in the Chesapeake and Boston in Massachusetts Bay. The economies of the New England and Chesapeake colonies were very different. The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies' economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops. This focus on cash crops fostered a need for slave labor in the Chesapeake. As a result, more enslaved Africans went to the Chesapeake than New England. The New England climate and terrain was not suitable for growing cash crops like tobacco. A plantation economy did not develop in New England because plantation crops would not grow. In the Chesapeake, however, the soil, weather, and flat terrain were excellent for tobacco growing. Had the climate of Virginia been more similar to Connecticut, it’s reasonable to say the two colonies would have been very similar. The sharp contrast in the climates and terrain accounts for much of the difference in the development of the two regions.

7 0
3 years ago
It was common for slave traders to force slaves to eat and punish them for not eating because
kotykmax [81]

The answer would be B. The more slaves that survive, the more profit that the slave traders made. In this case, most slave traders were urgently wanting large amounts of profit. So, the traders would do as much as it took to keep as many as they could alive throughout the voyage.

When slaves die, the trader loses profit.

3 0
3 years ago
when the boucicauts established the worlds first department store they introduced many changes make the statement if it accurate
Bas_tet [7]
They were allowed to use credit and the clothes were displayed for customers to browse through.
C,D,E
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose the Federal Reserve decides to increase the money supply. Which of the following predicts the most likely results? Inter
stiks02 [169]
The correct answer is B

<span> Interest rates will fall, meaning that banks will give more loans and more businesses can open and hire workers. More money in the economy implies that banks has more money to lend, which will assist businesses to expand and hire employees.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the Civil War inevitable? Could anything have been done through compromise to stop it, or did it have to happen? In one para
alexgriva [62]

Answer:

yes it was Inevitable. tensions about slavery and southern state rights were bound to explode along with calls for secession And boy did they happen. It started with the south seceding. The rest of the united states didn't take the secession seriously though until the south attacked a fort and raided it for munitions and supplies.   then and only then did the civil war fully explode into a reality.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is it important to not concentrate too much power in one branch of government
    12·2 answers
  • What did children do for entertainment in the 1700s?
    13·1 answer
  • Which document is considered a primary source concerning the american revolution?
    14·1 answer
  • Gasoline was rationed during World War II because there were no gas stations. It was in short supply. Prices were high. Prices w
    7·2 answers
  • Why Did The Crusades Begin?
    8·2 answers
  • 1. What is the difference between civil rights and civil liberties?
    8·1 answer
  • Hey! i’ll give brainliest please help.
    15·1 answer
  • The concept of land differs from culture to culture. The First Nations peoples thought of land differently than Europeans did. T
    7·1 answer
  • How does the celebration of the holiday bring unity and close the gaps of the past
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST states the main idea of the text? * !30 POINTS!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!