what is your question ??
I think u have missed some parts here in the question ..
Answer:
b. The refusal has an anti competitive effect on the market.
Explanation:
When a company that sells certain products fails to sell same to a retailer who deals in same products, such is said to have anti competitive effect on the market. The aim is to reduce competition in the market.
This type of refusal would always lead to price fixing, boycott.etc. When there is price fixing, it would lead to customers being unable to buy the product due to high price.
Products that are evenly distributed and not selective would increase competition in the market place such that customers would be able to purchase such product in any retail shop that sells the products.
Answer:
<u>Part a: What will be the equilabrium price that Dumphy and Funke will charge?</u>
Answer: Price charged = $30
<u>Part b: What are the profits for Dumphy and Funke at the equilibrium price?</u>
Answer: Profit on equilibrium price = $0
<u>Part c: What type of competition would Funke and Dumphy likely engage in after the decrease in demand?</u>
Answer: Price competition
Explanation:
<u>Part a: What will be the equilabrium price that Dumphy and Funke will charge?</u>
Answer:
Price charged by each of the artists will be equal to their marginal cost.
Thus, equilibrium P = MC = $30.
<u>Part b: What are the profits for Dumphy and Funke at the equilibrium price?</u>
Answer:
Equilibrium profits will be 0 at the equilibrium because price charged is equal to MC, leading to no profits.
<u>Part c: What type of competition would Funke and Dumphy likely engage in after the decrease in demand?</u>
Answer:
Price competition - as changes in price will lead to changes in demand and thus sales
True rather be safe then sorry
