The better the IRR, the better. but, a corporation may additionally decide on a mission with a decreased IRR as it has other intangible advantages, together with contributing to a larger strategic plan or impeding competition.
Solution:
NPV of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+10.5%) + $250//(1+10.5%)^2 +$10//(1+10.5%)^3 +$5//(1+10.5%)^4 =25.49320776
IRR of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+r%) + $250//(1+r%)^2 +$10//(1+r%)^3 +$5//(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.80%
NPV of Project L = -$1,000+ $5/(1+10.5%) +$260/(1+10.5%)^2 + $420/(1+10.5%)^3 + $802.50/(1+10.5%)^4
=$67.01
IRR of Project L=
-$1,000+ $5/(1+r%) +$260/(1+r%)^2 + $420/(1+r%)^3 + $802.50/(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.700%
Project L is better than Project S since L has higher NPV
IRR of Project L is 12.7%.
Learn more about IRR here:-brainly.com/question/28428807
#SPJ4
<span> c) Samuel Morse becasue he the only person
</span>
Answer:
hope it's help you ok have a good day
Answer: False
Explanation:
The contract is such that Molly agreed to bring bracelets if Jean would pay for said bracelets.
The terms of the contract therefore are that Jean would pay and Molly would deliver. Jean then calls Molly and says that they will be unable to pay which means that they are not going to be able to hold up their responsibilities in the contract.
Molly has the right to then cancel the contract because the other party will not be able to perform their obligations and face no repercussion for it.
Answer:
Transactional leadership
Explanation:
This leadership involves an exchange process whereby followers get immediate and tangible rewards for carrying out the leader’s orders. The leader can clarify what is expected of followers´ performance explaining how to meet such expectations and allocating rewards that are contingent on meeting objectives.
