The answer would be B because demand would increase, therefore if there are more consumers there will be less product as people keep buying (therefore p decreases)
Answer:
B. gives the same answer regardless of the direction of change
Explanation:
The computation of the price elasticity of demand using mid point formula is shown below:
Price elasticity of demand = (Percentage change in quantity demanded) ÷ (percentage change in price)
where,
Percentage change in quantity demanded is
= (change in quantity demanded ÷ average of quantity demanded)
And,
The percentage change in price is
= (percentage change in price ÷ average of price)
Therefore, it reflects the same answer
B
i think because you dont want a job that is not what you want to do.
Answer:
We see that Prog A will give an annual CF of 75%*$6000 = $4500
Prog B will give annual CF of 95%*$6000 = $5700
Disc Rate Kd = 20%
So PV of Annuity of $1 for 5 yrs with Kd = 20% is 2.9906
So NPV of Prog A = CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -12000+2.9906*4500 = $1,458
So NPV of Prog B= CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -20000+2.9906*5700 = $(2,954)
So Prog A is more effective as it gives a Positive NPV
Answer:
$ (-4t+872)
Explanation:
Earning for 1 hour as a tutor= $10
Earnings for 1 hour as a waitress= $14
Total hours worked in the month combined jobs= 83 hrs
Number of hours worked as a tutor for the month= t
Finding the number of hours worked as a waitress for the month= 83-t hours
Total amount earned that month = amount earned as a tutor+ amount earned as a waitress
Amount earned as a tutor= $10 × t = $10t
Amount earned as a waitress= $14× (83-t)= $ (1162-14t)
Total amount earned combined= $ 10t + $ (1162-14t)
=$ ( 10t-14t +1162)
= $ (-4t+872)