Well i would assume this is a simile since the use of “as” and it’s comparing one thing to another :)
<span>The correct answer is federal spending. It's a great thing for regulating federal spending because it can be used to nullify and veto only specific parts of legislature without vetoing the entire legislature pack. This way you can only ban the part that would increase spending, but you wouldn't ban the entire law from being voted.</span>
The answer to this question would be A) or the first option.
Statement of U.S. foreign policy toward China. Issued by U.S. secretary of state John Hay (1899), the statement reaffirmed the principle that all countries should have equal access to any Chinese port open to trade.
Bush V. Gore (2000)
The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of George W. Bush, against the recount of votes in Florida, despite a 537 vote difference.