1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
3 years ago
8

When did the term "genocide" become prominent? no

History
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A term coined by Raphael Lemkin in his 1944 book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Likely based off of the Holocaust and his personal experience with the Armenian massacres

You might be interested in
The watchman did not recognize the smoke as a new fire. The watchman sent out a signal to the wrong fire station. The first fire
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

c,The fire might have been extinguished sooner if several mistakes had not been made.

Explanation:

just took the test on e2020

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was one of the heroes from the Battle? Explain who they are and what they did.
RideAnS [48]
Which battle are you talking about because there are many
7 0
3 years ago
Who was the 16th president
svet-max [94.6K]
The answer is Abraham Lincoln
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
To truly understand the complexity of a historical event, historians must consider the
Veronika [31]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

there are a number of reasons and small incidents before the happening of historical event. to understand a particular historical event, the historians must see the circumstances and reasons due to which the historical event occurs. There are various reasons behind the historical event so it is necessary for the historian to see that reasons in order to fully understand the event.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did slavery begin in Africa
    8·1 answer
  • What are the factors that caused the new world civilizations to be less technologically advanced than the old world?
    7·1 answer
  • What happened during the reign of terror in France
    13·2 answers
  • Congress was told that
    8·1 answer
  • Which choice fits in the blank in this Progressive Era timeline? A) 1903- Helen Hunt Jackson publishes regarding treatment of Na
    15·1 answer
  • Did black codes limit or guarantee civil rights
    12·2 answers
  • Compared to the South during the Civil War, the North had more *
    5·2 answers
  • Immediately after ww1, how were conditions in japan different from conditions in germany
    7·1 answer
  • 5. What is the evidence that shows the theory of "accidental drift" is wrong for explaining how humans spread throughout the Pac
    10·1 answer
  • EDG2020
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!