Answer:
Hey. Here's the answer.
The Act was one of the most controversial elements of the 1850 compromise and heightened Northern fears of a "slave power conspiracy." It required that all escaped slaves, upon capture, be returned to their masters and that officials and citizens of free states had to cooperate.
Answer:How is the Bill of Rights contained in the Texas Constitution different from the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution? Question options: The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution states that rights it defines cannot be taken away from citizens. The Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution states that the rights it defines cannot be taken away Texans. The Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution guarantees rights to those accused of a crime, while the United States Constitution Bill of Rights does not. The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution guarantees rights to those accused of a crime, while the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution does not.
Explanation:
Question- Which statement accurately describes events in the Revolutionary War?
Subject- History/Social Studies
Time This Question Was Answered- On Tuesday, April 28th 2020, at 8:56PM
Answer- The correct answer for this question is, B)The American victory at Saratoga convinced France to join the war on the colonists' side.
Further Explanation On My Answer- The battle of Saratoga was one of the most important wars fought during the course of the war of independence of the United States. Its outcome contributed, to a large extent, to deciding the final outcome of the contest in favor of the continental army. This battle took place between September 19 and October 17, 1777 in Saratoga, a region located between Boston and the Great Lakes area, in the vicinity of the Hudson River. The victory strengthened the possibility of triumph of the citizen militias over a line army, which precipitated the support of France (1778) and the Spanish Empire (1779) to the American independence cause.
Answer: Today, as a result of extensive new research and profound changes in American race relations, historians view Reconstruction far more favorably, as a time of genuine progress for former slaves and the South
