1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kramer
2 years ago
11

The ratio of land value to building value is used when estimating site value by the

Social Studies
1 answer:
matrenka [14]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The ratio of land value to building value is used when estimating site value by the allocation method.

Explanation:

It is used for site and land valuation or appraisal.  Allocation method  is ideal when comparable are not given or known. When a new home is constructed on land area that has been recently bought or purchased, then Allocation method will be ideal . It is best suitable when given as percentage or proportion of the property’s total value that has been improved.

But when comparable improved sale is used , land or the building portion of the property should be determined first. For a newly built home , cost of improvements divided by the sales price of the home gives the percentage of improvements compared to purchase price of  comparable.This method is not ideal for older homes.  

To apply this method

  • First identity a comparable site or comparable land with vacant home sales as well as vacant lot sales.  
  • Next, find out  value of the land to total property values ratio.  
  • Then, apply the ratio to the property that is being appraised. This will determine the appropriate value of the land or site.

You might be interested in
What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?
Ede4ka [16]
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
3 0
3 years ago
Question:
Iteru [2.4K]
I think the answer is D
5 0
2 years ago
What is the simple principle that evolutionary psychology is based on?
shtirl [24]
Natural Selection, or human adaptations through evolution.
3 0
3 years ago
the use of canines for research is restricted by ethics committees in many countries, and social acceptance is declining.
joja [24]

Answer:

Yes, it is becoming an unethical practice.

Explanation:

Animal research has had a vital role in many scientific and medical advances of the past century and continues to aid our understanding of various diseases. Throughout the world, people enjoy a better quality of life because of these advances, and the subsequent development of new medicines and treatments—all made possible by animal research. However, the use of animals in scientific and medical research has been a subject of heated debate for many years in the UK. Opponents to any kind of animal research—including both animal-rights extremists and anti-vivisectionist groups—believe that animal experimentation is cruel and unnecessary, regardless of its purpose or benefit. There is no middle ground for these groups; they want the immediate and total abolition of all animal research. If they succeed, it would have enormous and severe consequences for scientific research.

No responsible scientist wants to use animals or cause them unnecessary suffering if it can be avoided, and therefore scientists accept controls on the use of animals in research. More generally, the bioscience community accepts that animals should be used for research only within an ethical framework.

The UK has gone further than any other country to write such an ethical framework into law by implementing the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. It exceeds the requirements in the European Union's Directive 86/609/EEC on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes, which is now undergoing revision (Matthiessen et al, 2003). The Act requires that proposals for research involving the use of animals must be fully assessed in terms of any harm to the animals. This involves a detailed examination of the particular procedures and experiments, and the numbers and types of animals use. These are then weighed against the potential benefits of the project. This cost-benefit analysis is almost unique to UK animal research legislation; only German law has a similar requirement.

The UK has gone further than any other country to write such an ethical framework into law by implementing the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986

In addition, the UK government introduced 1998 further ‘local' controls—that is, an Ethical Review Process at research institutions—which promote good animal welfare and humane science by ensuring that the use of animals at the designated establishment is justified. The aims of this additional review process are: to provide independent ethical advice, particularly with respect to applications for project licenses, and standards of animal care and welfare; to provide support to licensees regarding animal welfare and ethical issues; and to promote ethical analysis to increase awareness of animal welfare issues and to develop initiatives for the widest possible application of the 3Rs—replacement, reduction, and refinement of the use of animals in research (Russell & Burch, 1959). In practice, there has been concern that the Ethical Review Process adds a level of bureaucracy that is not in proportion to its contribution to improving animal welfare or furthering the 3Rs.

Animal-rights groups also disagree with the 3Rs, since these principles still allow for the use of animals in research; they are only interested in replacement

Although animals cannot yet be completely replaced, it is important that researchers maximize refinement and reduction

3 0
1 year ago
Write a difference between natural resource and economic resource ​
MAXImum [283]

MAKE ME AS BRAIN LIEST PLZ

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which term describes any push or pull that occurs when magnetic poles interact?
    5·1 answer
  • Help! please and thank you. what answer is and why?
    12·1 answer
  • In the term "due process,” the word "process” refers to the way in which
    10·2 answers
  • A bureaucrat who had no hope of advancing professionally still followed every rule, even when it slowed down his work and person
    6·2 answers
  • President Andrew Johnson's leniency with former Confederate officials and his veto of legislation designed to provide civil righ
    6·2 answers
  • Which law designates the steps that federal agencies must follow in issuing rules and regulations?
    10·1 answer
  • The boomerang was used by the Aborigines in Australia MAINLY for what purpose? A) hunting B) punishment C) religious ceremonies
    11·2 answers
  • Recreational time can come before or after school.
    11·2 answers
  • What are mexico's mineral resources
    5·1 answer
  • When a person is indicated for a crime what is the next step in the legal process
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!