All categories

3 years ago

In 1 to 2 paragraphs, analyze how a person's ethics or values might affect his performance on

Business

1 answer:

andrey2020 [161]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A person's individual ethos truly reflects his/her business ethics too. Although general ethics in general is not influencing job performance (both in terms of effectiveness and efficiency) directly, bad ethics can sometimes be detrimental for someone's career. For example, if it is to be discovered that an employee has taken full credit for a colleague's achievement, his/her credibility will drastically fall and he/she will have less chance to get promoted.

On the other hand, if an individual possesses exceptionally good ethics or values (for example, being constantly sincere and not afraid to be direct with somebody even when it gets uncomfortable), it will certainly become noticed both by colleagues and managers. Thus, the employee with good ethics is very likely to get promoted.

You might be interested in

A partial listing of costs incurred during March at Febbo Corporation appears below: Factory supplies $ 9,000 Administrative wag

lana [24]

Answer:

$293,000

Explanation:

The computation of the product cost is shown below:

= Direct material + direct labor + factory supplies + factory depreciation + indirect labor

= $126,000 + $99,000 + $9,000 + $33,000 + $26,000

= $293,000

The factory supplies + factory depreciation + indirect labor = manufacturing overhead

All other cost are not relevant for the computation part. Hence, ignored it

6 0

3 years ago

When the ace hardware store located in franklin mails an advertising flyer to all the residents in the community, it is an examp

densk [106]

This could be either print media or support media. I believe it is print media.

7 0

4 years ago

While _______ decisions will generally need to be processed via the ______ system in our brains in order for us to reach a good

Jet001 [13]

Answer:

Nonprogrammed; reflective; programmed; reactive

Explanation:

Programmed decisions can be regarded as decision which involves well understood criteria when making it,. nonprogrammed decisions on the other hand can be explained as decisions which are novel, they are decision that does not have clear guidelines when trying to reach solution. rules as well as guidelines can be set up for programmed decisions by Managers when known fact is available because this will enhance in reaching

decisions quickly. It should be noted that While non programmed decisions will generally need to be processed via the reflective system in our brains in order for us to reach a good decision, with programmed decisions, heuristics can allow decision-makers to switch to the quick, reactive system.

5 0

3 years ago

Asset A and B have expected returns of 5% and 3% per year respectively. Their annual volatilities are both 20% and the correlati

Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

1. Weight of A=0.5, Weight of B= 0.5

2. Asset A has the highest shape ratio. The weight of A and B in the optimal risky portfolio that has the highest shape ratio is:

Weight of A= 0.105, Weight of B= 0.895

Explanation:

Expected return of Asset A= 5%Expected return of Asset A= 5%

Expected return of Asset B= 3%

Annual volatilities of Asset A= 20%

Annual votalities of Asset B= 20%

1. Correlation coefficient = 30% = 0.3 < 1

Risk Free Rate = 1% =0.01

1. Weight of A and B in portfolio with minimal risk is:

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Therefore,

CovXAXB = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2

= 0.012

Hence,

Weight of A= (0.2)^2 - 0.012 / (0.2)^2 + (0.2)^2 - 2(0.012)

Weight of A= 0.04 - 0.012 / 0.04 + 0.04 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.08 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.056

=0.5

Weight of A = 0.5

Weight of B= 1 - Weight of A

Weight of B= 1 - 0.5

Weight of B= 0.5

2. Shape ratio of A= RA - Rf / β

= 0.05 - 0.01 / 2

= 0.04/2

= 0.02 =20%

Shape ratio of B= RB - Rf / β

= 0.03 - 0.01/ 2

0.02 / 2

=0.01 = 10%

So, Asset A has the highest shape ratio

Cov (XAXB) = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.03 × 0.2 × 0.1

= 0.006

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Weight of A = (0.1)^2 - 0.006 / (0.2)^2 + (0.1)^2 - 2(0.006)

= 0.01 - 0.006 / 0.04 +0.01 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.05 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.038

= 0.105

Weight of A = 0.105

Weight of B= 1 - 0.105

Weight of B= 0.895

3 0

4 years ago

Snyder, Inc. manufactures three types of golf balls; the Worm-burner, the Escalator, and the Slice. Over the past year, variable

jolli1 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Sales mix is a ratio of products sold. In this case, sales by golf ball type as a percentage of total sales is the sales mix as it shows the ratio of product sold.

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers