Answer:
Placebo effects or experimenter bias are likely to affect results
Explanation:
Due to the fact that everyone in the class is quite excited about being taught by the new method, the most obvious error will be the placebo effect, a phenomenon where some people would perceive some benefit of some sort because they already know what is expected of them. Experimental bias may also occur since everyone is quite excited, but then he chooses to allocate the teaching method to a random half and the old method to the other half. This can cause the students allocated to the old method to provide bad reports and those who are allocated to the new method to claim excitement.
Answer:
Forensic psychologists, that is psychologists that specialize in psychological evaluation and treatment, especially in legal cases have become commonplace in death penalty cases ever since the Supreme Court ruled that capital sentencing must be based on the individual offense and the perpetrator of the crime. What this means, in essence, is that psychological factors among others must be considered as it could possibly influence jury decision.
The importance of forensic psychologists in the death penalty was greatly highlighted after the Supreme Court decided in 2002 that the use of the death penalty for mentally unstable people was unconstitutional. If an accused is deemed mentally unfit by a psychologist, such a person cannot face the death sentence. This goes on to underline the importance of the psychologists' assessments in death penalty cases.
<span>Texas gained its independence from Mexico in 1836
</span>
Answer:
Probably A (I'm 99% sure)
Explanation:
By process of elimination I can tell it's not a rain gauge or a thermometer. However it could either be A. barometer or D. weather satellite. However, I think A. barometer because a weather satellite can only take images every 5-15 minutes, however a barometer is real time and can easily predict weather.
