Answer:
Risk arbitrage.
Explanation:
This strategy in business dealings is seen to be forced up when a form of security is been sold from a firm to another. This is done with its value been raised very high; not minding the risk been involved. It can also be described as a form of exploitation of the market especially when seen to be imbalanced. Especially in the trade of stocks; here, these stocks are been bought during these imbalance period and been given out for sale at high and outrageous prices.
Answer:
The market analyst is requesting you to perform a formal research.
Explanation:
Formal research is a research style used by researchers (and students) that uses a very formal structure in order to carry out a scientific research (or very similar type). Formal research obtains and analyzes data in a controlled and systematic manner, that tries to avoid subjective bias and focuses on objective information.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The correct option is C :price to increase and the profits of firms in the market to decrease
This can be explained by the fact that, since it always been mandatory to possess a license in order to work in a particular market. This certainly reduces the competition in the market and thus, the prices would increase; therefore, as the firms have to pay for licence thus would reduce the profits of firm.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
The correct answer to your question is : <span>A law is passed whereby a mandatory retirement age of 60 is imposed</span>