In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
I know the 2nd and the 3rd one are correct.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "b. party members in Congress." Congressional committee assignments are one way that political parties demonstrate control over b. party members in Congress
Here are the following choices:
a. the party-in-the-electorate
b. party members in Congress
c. interest groups
d. all of the above
The air pollution in London reached its highest point around 1875.
As a result of the Industrial Revolution, London became:
- overpopulated
- heavily polluted
- quite noisy
From the description of the graph, we can tell that around the year 1875, London suffered the highest air pollution shown by the graph as air pollution reached 610 micrograms per cubic meter.
In conclusion, 1875 saw the worst air pollution in London according to this graph but it is a good thing that this has improved massively as of 2016.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12048112.</em>
