1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jasenka [17]
3 years ago
10

The following selected transactions relate to liabilities of Food Emporium whose fiscal year ends on December 31.

Business
1 answer:
Kaylis [27]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Please see explanatory column for answer.

Explanation:

No Journal entry

Date         Amount and explanation                    Debit      Credit

Jan 26            No entry                                           No entry

Reason: this is because even though an agreement was reached in the negotiation,no transaction took place.

Journal to record loan from City Bank

Date         Amount and explanation                    Debit            Credit

March 1    Cash                                                   $350,000

            Notes payable                                                              $350,000

Journal to record payment of  loan with interest  from City Bank from March - September.

Date         Amount and explanation                    Debit            Credit

September 1   Notes payable                            $350,000

                      Interest Expense                           $14,000

                         Cash                                                                   $364,000

calculation: Interest = PxRXT= 350,000 X 8% X 6/12= $14,000

You might be interested in
The Raven Co. has just gone public. Under a firm commitment agreement, Raven received $15.90 for each of the 25 million shares s
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

22.38%

Explanation:

Raven corporation has just gone public

They received $15.90 for each 25 million shares that was sold

The first step is to calculate the net amount raised

Net amount that was raised= 15.90×25,000,000 = 397,500,000

397,500,000-860,000-330,000

= 396,310,000

Underwriter spread= 17.50-15.90

= 1.6 per shares

Total underwriter spread= per share spread× number of shares that were offered

= 1.6×25,000,000

= 40,000,000

Total direct costs= 40,000,000+860,000

=40,860,000

Indirect flotation cost= indirect cost+price appreciation

= 330,000+(19.40-17.50)×25,000,000

= 330,000+1.9×25,000,000

=330,000+47,500,000

= 47,830,000

Total flotation cost= 47,830,000+40,860,000

= 88,690,000

Therefore, the flotation cost as a percentage of funds raised can be calculated as follows

= 88,690,000/396,310,000 × 100

= 0.2238×100

= 22.38%

Hence the flotation costs as a percentage of funds raised is 22.38%

3 0
3 years ago
Many companies monitor their​ employees' internet use and email. Why might they be doing​ this?
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

b) to reduce shirking

Explanation:

In this model, shirking is defined as a lack of employee work effort. An employee's tendency to give less than full effort represents shirking, with greater deviations from 100 percent effort representing greater levels of. shirking.

6 0
3 years ago
At the beginning of the month, the Painting Department of Skye Manufacturing had 20,000 units in inventory, 70% complete as to m
velikii [3]

Answer:

Cost per EUP Materials: $2,00

Cost per EUP Conversion: $4,50

Explanation:

                                              Materials                        Conversion

Beginning WIP Cost              $22,400                             $6,250

Cost added in the period   <u>$229,600                         $540,500</u>

Total Cost of the Units        $252,000                         $546,750

Equivalent Units of Production (EUP): Completed Units + Ending WIP Units

EUP Materials = 120,000 + 15,000 x 40% = 126,000

EUP Conversion = 120,000 + 15,000 x 10% = 121,500

Cost per Equivalent Unit: Cost of Units / EUP  

Cost per EUP Materials: $252,000 / 126,000 = $2,00

Cost per EUP Conversion: $546,750 / 121,500 = $4,50

5 0
3 years ago
Why does price discrimination improve the efficiency of the market compared to monopoly or monopolistic competition?
svetoff [14.1K]
Why does price discrimination improve the efficiency of the market compared to monopoly or monopolistic competition? P<span>erfect price discrimination allows us to be at a point where MC = D. Monopolistic competition equals demand for the product in the equation above. Because price discrimination relates to the price of an item changing based on the demand for it, it is ideal for demand to align with the market competition. 
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Who got g mail?? lmk
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:I do

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Brian is a truck driver who delivers products throughout Massachusetts. His friend Chris is a traffic planner for the same state
    14·1 answer
  • Windell Company uses flexible budgets. At normal capacity of 8,000 units, budgeted manufacturing overhead is: $64,000 variable a
    9·1 answer
  • My question is highlighted in blue. Please help me! I’ll give brainliest and 50 points!
    10·2 answers
  • If you are interested in working for a specific company, what type of job site should you look at for opening?
    7·1 answer
  • In​ 2008, as a financial crisis began to unfold in the United​ States, the FDIC raised the limit on insured losses to bank depos
    6·1 answer
  • Which plan offers a tax-free education?
    14·1 answer
  • Cindy has her eye on a sundress but thinks it is too expensive. It goes on sale for 15% less than the original price. Before Cin
    14·1 answer
  • [Ch 10] You are the CFO of a company, and you need to analyze a new product line. The company has 8% coupon-bonds outstanding wi
    14·1 answer
  • How to prevent culture background for affecting businesses
    7·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!