Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson thought that what powers were not specifically stated in the Constitution belonged to the states and the people. Ultimately, it was the job of the people to keep the federal government in check.
I'm pretty sure it would be B, because the tensions between most groups are mainly to do with religious differences, especially relating to the belief of how many gods exist.
It didn't and it did. Just because the case happened in 1954 doesn't mean that schools ended segregation, as a matter of fact it lasted for almost a decade more, if not longer because schools would still refuse to obey. Southern communities were especially supportive of segregation, and even when the civil rights acts were implemented they still didn't support them and they didn't want to be around African-Americans only it had to be hidden. On the other hand, when a Supreme Court makes a decision it does sway people to support it. That is because there is an idea of everyone being equal in the eyes of law and the supreme court is the judge on what is lawful and what isn't based on the constitution. Since there's no greater legal act than the constitution, when the supreme court makes a decision it means that the decision fits the constitution and for many Americans the constitution is almost a holy document that guides their lives. A negative externality can be for example the rise of extremism. During the reconstruction period Ku Klux Klan rose as a negative externality of the era. During the civil acts era they grew stronger again because racist people were enraged by things like desegregation.
They strove for a moral society.
A. Slave Trade seems to be the only logical choice.
The man did not lead an empire like a Muslim leader should have.
