It is young and still gowing
Answer:
Pros:
Your wrath may get them to do what you wanted at that moment.
This may cause them not to question you in the future.
Cons:
There will be consequences for your actions.
Your harshness may cause them to disobey you out of spite.
You will not be friends with this person of you continue to treat them this way.
Your reputation may be tarnished, causing others to avoid you.
Explanation:
The best course of action is to be loving towards other people, and to not be harsh to them. There are times that you will have to reprove people, but you must do this out of love. Hope this helps friend.
<span>that the nature of poetry is limitless</span>
Answer:
1.Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.
2.One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.
Explanation:
The word.....its as a whole committee is single
enjoy !!
