Throughout World war 1 airplanes were most often used to Bomb targets on land because this was seen as one of the most effective ways to hurt the enemy.
In Rwanda, the Rwandan genocide of 1994
The answer to this really depends on what prism you are viewing it from?
As a globe, we are pretty opposed to imperialism these days. China has started to dabble a little more in the South China Sea but we mostly have our nation states and there isn't really a lot of movement.
That was not the case at the time of annexation.
So, is it ethical to subsume a sovereign nation? No
Was it strategically justifiable at the time? Yes. If the United States had not annexed Hawaii, the Empire of Japan likely would have stepped in.
Hawaii has enormous strategic value and was then justifiable at the time of annexation.
That being said, and I hope this is an obvious statement, imperialism is not a good thing and is ethically problematic.
No choices but the worst thing about the Cuban misspell crisis was It can hit America
Answer:
Anglo-Saxon racism .
Explanation:
Anglo-Saxon is a term that refers to the cultural mix that is the basis of England´s culture. Through widespread use, it has become synonym with cultural expressions associated with the English language and the English-speaking countries. In this case, Anglo-Saxon racism refers to racist behavior and attitudes seen in Great Britain.
