1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
5

Which statement best explains the Three-Fifths Compromise?

History
1 answer:
Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is: For the purposes of determining the population of a state, three out of every five enslaved people would be counted.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the Red Scare?
Andrej [43]

the Red Scare refers to a period of political and cultural instability in the United States during the late 1940s and the 1950s wherein the United States was so fearful of communists in their midst due to a Cold War with the United States that neighbors informed on neighbors and people were blacklisted from employment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Details.<br> 1.<br> Discuss the criticisms of the name Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
KATRIN_1 [288]
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male is the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history, as noted by Arthur L. Caplan (1992). Begun in 1932 by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS), the study was purportedly designed to determine the natural course of untreated latent syphilis in some 400 African American men in Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama. The research subjects, all of whom had syphilis when they were enrolled in the study-contrary to the “urban myth” that holds “black men in Alabama were injected with the virus that causes syphilis” (Walker, 1992)-were matched against 200 uninfected subjects who served as a control group.

The subjects were recruited with misleading promises of “special free treatment,” which were actually spinal taps done without anesthesia to study the neurological effects of syphilis, and they were enrolled without their informed consent.

The subjects received heavy metals therapy, standard treatment in 1932, but were denied antibiotic therapy when it became clear in the 1940s that penicillin was a safe and effective treatment for the disease. When penicillin became widely available by the early 1950s as the preferred treatment for syphilis, this therapy was again withheld. On several occasions, the USPHS actually sought to prevent treatment.

The first published report of the study appeared in 1936, with subsequent papers issued every four to six years until the early 1970s. In l969, a committee at the federally operated Center for Disease Control decided the study should continue. Only in 1972, when accounts of the study first appeared in the national press, did the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) halt the experiment.

At that time, 74 of the test subjects were still alive; at least 28, but perhaps more than 100, had died directly from advanced syphilis. An investigatory panel appointed by HEW in August 1972 found the study “ethically unjustified” and argued that penicillin should have been provided to the men. As a result, the National Research Act, passed in 1974, mandated that all federally funded proposed research with human subjects be approved by an institutional review board (IRB). By 1992, final payments of approximately $40,000 were made to survivors under an agreement settling the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Tuskegee Study subjects. President Clinton publicly apologized on behalf of the federal government to the handful of study survivors in April 1997.

Several major ethical issues involving human research subjects need to be studied further. The first major ethical issue to be considered is informed consent, which refers to telling potential research participants about all aspects of the research that might reasonably influence their decision to participate. A major unresolved concern is exactly how far researchers’ obligations extend to research subjects. Another concern has to do with the possibility that a person might feel pressured to agree or might not understand precisely what he or she is agreeing to. The investigators took advantage of a deprived socioeconomic situation in which the participants had experienced low levels of care. The contacts were with doctors and nurses who were seen as authority figures.
4 0
2 years ago
Words that become triggers of action
Helen [10]

Answer:.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was one of john marshals important accomplishments as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?
Mice21 [21]

establishing the power of judicial review

Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
What was an effect of the decline in trade after the fall of the Roman Empire?
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

C. There was a shift in rural society

Explanation:

Took the test and got it right

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The election of Abraham Lincoln set off Southern secession. What were two viewpoints the president held on slavery? States that
    12·2 answers
  • The dating of artifacts is done by a _____-age system based on the development of tools and technology.
    12·2 answers
  • Examples and non examples of isolationism
    13·1 answer
  • Why we're industrial and agriculture surplus a problem for the us economy
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the U.S. invade Panama and Grenada?
    15·2 answers
  • Which form of classical Greek theater takes its name from the Greek word for ""action""?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following ideas is an important part of the fascist ideology?
    14·2 answers
  • Which is responsible for the banning of literacy tests?
    7·1 answer
  • How was slavery different from indentured servitude in North American colonies
    14·2 answers
  • Why did railroad expansion increase the populations of major urban centers during the gilded age
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!