He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.
I would ask them if they were comfortable with a fluctuating rate, which though at the moment is lower than the fixed rate, could go up in the future. I would also ask them if they needed to be sure of the rate say for example for a 5 year term like in a mortgage for peace of mind or if they are willing to take a risk with the fluctuations. If the latter, I would tell them that at any time they could lock it in for a 5 year term if they saw it going up.
Answer: an increment in profit $1615
Explanation:
2700 pounds of Banana
Total cost = $864
If sold = $1485
When converted into bread $2565 and sold at the cost of $4480
Oven rentage = $300
What is the incremental effect on income if Publix converts the bananas to banana bread?
Sales Amount - Expenses incurred
= $4480 - $2565 + $300
= $4480 - $2865
= $1615
If he had sold the bananas
Sales amount - cost amount
= $1485 - $864
= $621
By converting the bananas to bread the incremental effect on income is it would yield more profits at $1615 compared to when sold at which is $621
Answer:
32.59 days
Explanation:
DSO = Average receivables / Sales Revenue X 365
= $56,736 / (2,473,701 - 1,838,207) x 365
= $56,736 / (635,494) x 365
= 32.59 days
