Answer:
NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV LEONID BREZHNEV
-relaxed previous restrictions -ended many reforms
-engaged in the Cuban Missile Crisis -supported hard-line communism
-stopped uprisings in Eastern Europe
Explanation:
I just got it right on Edge 2021
Answer:
The Schlieffen Plan was a German war plan designed by General Alfred von Schlieffen. What did the Schlieffen Plan call for? It called for a quick attack on France through Belgium, attacking the French from behind.
I believe the answer is: its supply or demand is not sensitive to price changes
A goods would fall under inelastic category if that product is considered as basic/primary needs for most consumers.
Example of such goods is food and water. No matter how much the price of food and water rises, the demand for this goods would stay relatively stagnant because people have to use them to survive.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Northwest ordinance of 1787. I hope this would help
Please mark as brainlist if correct! It'd mean a lot! Have a blessed day!
