1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lilavasa [31]
3 years ago
9

Discuss the philosophies of Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibnitz. How did they affect the Baroque era? Are there parts of their phil

osophies you agree with or disagree with? What are they? Why?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Helga [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

These philosophers attempted to expand the conceptions of religion, attaching aspects of reason and critical thinking. These points were the fundamental basis of the Baroque, once this period was extremely religious, but also a moment in history when science and the thought was in development, a heritage from the Renaissance. Descartes, Spinoza and Leibinz are traditionally considered as Rationalists philosophers. Each one of them believed that our knowledge born with us (Innatism).

Explanation:

As a conception of philosophical knowledge, the Rationalism began to take shape during the Renaissance, but its early origins can go back to Greek philosophy, with Platonic idealist theses and the conception of the principle of causality. For the rationalists, all the ideas we have originate from pure rationality, which also imposes an innate conception, that is, that the ideas have innate origins in the human being, being born with us in our intellect and being used and discovered by the people who they make better use of reason.

You might be interested in
Kaitlin's mother asks her what she would like to eat for dinner. Kaitlin responds, "Fis." Her mother queries, "Fis?" "No," Kaitl
poizon [28]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the source of energy for all living things​
zmey [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Sun

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
_____ are observable and easy to measure, while _____ are not so observable or easy to measure.
Julli [10]

Answer:

behaviors, mental processes

Explanation:

Behaviours observable and easy to measure, while mental processes are not so observable or easy to measure.

Human behaviours can be measured by three fundamental properties which include repeatability, temporal extent, and temporal locus. The ability to measure human behaviour is important as it helps to identify the function maintaining a problem behavior and to evaluate the success of a positive behavior support plan. On the contrary, mental processes such as perception, memory, thinking are not easily observable or measurable.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The absolute refractory period of an action potential
Blababa [14]

Answer:

the answer is most likely C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which number on the map represented the GREATEST barrier to westward expansion to the Pacific?
Brilliant_brown [7]

The answer for your question is one that's "A)"

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which U.S conflict was fought over slavery
    5·1 answer
  • In his book streetwise, elijah anderson argues that young african american men are more likely to be arrested because:
    15·1 answer
  • A country is currently in the second stage of the demographic transition. Currently the country has a birth rate of 37.9 births
    10·1 answer
  • A new behavior analyst is working with a family who has received ABA services for the last five years. A functional analysis has
    15·1 answer
  • How many people are there currently in the presidential line of succession?
    7·1 answer
  • Is it Spanish or vanish?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the usual settlement pattern of immigrants?. A) close to ports. B) far from people from their own country. C) close to
    15·2 answers
  • Austin wants to start budgeting so he first identifies his needs and his wants. How will this help him create a solid budget?
    15·1 answer
  • The answer is:<br> MIXED<br> What is the question?
    8·1 answer
  • An archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting humans inhabited a particular area long before it was originally believed to
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!