Answer:
Lack of Empathy & Mutual Understanding
Explanation:
Raj & Jamie, recently came together couple, broke up due to a conflict for about two days.
Both of them had made different plans for an evening (Raj - Concert & Jamie - dinner. So, they got disappointed with each other as - one's (Jamie's) plan got cancelled & then she was not in good mood while other's (Raj's) plan, which made the latter also upset.
Instead of fighting, they could have shown empathy towards each other's feelings and could have made an attempt to understand each other's state of mind by putting themselves in other one's shoe. Such empathy & mutual understanding could have helped them solve their issue in a manner, constructive for their relationship & could also have enhanced resilience of their relationship. For eg - they could have surprised each other with a surprise date of other one's choice (Raj - Dinner, Jamie - Movie/ concert) However, lack of empathy & mutual understanding turned a petty issue into huge conflict & broke up their relationship.
Answer:
That the conduct reported by the plaintiff did not meet the level of conduct required to find the intentional imposition of emotional distress
Explanation:
that answer explains the situation of the plaintiff
Preconceito é um sentimento afetivo em relação a uma pessoa ou membro do grupo com base unicamente na associação do grupo dessa pessoa
Answer:
In the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen says that all people have the right to choose laws. ... In the Rights of Man and Citizen it says nothing about taxation without representation being legal or illegal, while the Declaration of Independence says that it is illegal.
