Answer:
Bonds held to maturity are recorded at the net carrying value (after any premium or discount amortization is made), but since these bonds were purchased at face value, there is no premium or discount to be amortized. The bonds should be reported at face value as non-current assets since they mature in more than 1 year.
Explanation:
all the numbers are missing, so I looked for a similar question:
Otter Creek & Co. Owns vast amount of corporate bonds. Suppose Otter Creek buys $1,200,000 of RoastCo bonds at face value on January 2, 2016. The RoastCo bond spay interest at an annual rate of 3% on June 30 and December 31, and mature on December 31, 2020. Otter Creek intends to hold the investment until maturity.
How would the bond investment be classified on December 31, 2016, balance sheet?
Company’s products or services
Answer:
a) Breakeven price = Purchase price + Interest amount that would have been earned on the invested amount
Breakeven price = 23 + [23*e^(0.05*1/2) - 23]
Breakeven price = 23 + 0.5822477721
Breakeven price = $23.5822477721
b) Profit = Selling price - Breakeven price
Profit = $23.80 - $23.5822477721
Profit = $0.2177522279 per share
Answer:
$14,500
Explanation:
From the above, the below details are given;
Authorized share capital , which represent maximum number of shares that a company is allowed to issue.
Issued shares, which is the number of shares issued by a company including shares purchased and backed by a company(treasury stock).
There is also outstanding shares which is treasury stock less issued shares.
We do also know that treasury stock does not have any right of dividend because the shares are held by the company hence cannot pay dividend to itself.
Therefore, the total amount of the cash dividend is = 14,500 × $1.00
= $14,500
Answer: Antitrust law
Explanation:
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, was a part of the United States antitrust law with the aim of adding further substance to the United States antitrust law regime.
The Clayton Act was to prevent anticompetitive practices. It was enacted in 1914 with the objective of strengthening Sherman Antitrust Act. When Sherman Act was enacted in 1890, the regulators realized that that the act had some weaknesses which made it impossible to prevent anti-competitive practices in businesses so the Clayton Act addressed the issue.
