Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
Customer Perceived Value (CPV)
Explanation:
CPV is associated with product marketing and branding. It state that success of product depends on customer perception about the product or service ability to setify their needs. Customers interpret and react to marketing messages.
A military officer training program
Answer:
Complete information
Explanation:
A limiting pricing can be described as a strategy that is employed by an incumbent to prevent entry by maintaining a price lower than the monopoly price.
In situation whereby there is completion information, it will be more difficult for an incumbent to successfully engage in limit pricing because knowledge about the incumbent, the market, product, and others is available to others.
