The goal of writing a number in scientific notation is to have a decimal number, with one digit to the left of the decimal point, followed by a <span>×⨯</span><span>1010</span> to some power. To format the number this way, multiply the <span>0.00000910.0000091</span> by <span>1010</span> <span><span>−6</span><span>-6</span></span> times, making it <span>9.19.1</span>. Each multiplication by <span>1010</span> moves the decimal point one digit to the left, but in order to keep the same number, multiply <span>9.19.1</span> by <span><span>10<span>−6</span></span><span>10<span>-6</span></span></span>.<span>9.1×<span>10<span>−<span>6</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
123°
Step-by-step explanation:
Supplementary angles add up to be 180 degrees.
This means angles A and B will add up to be 180 degrees.
We can find the measure of angle B by subtracting 57 from 180
180 - 57
= 123
So, the measure of angle B is 123 degrees
I think 2003000000 is the answer
5^2 +12^2= diagonal^2
25+144=d^2
169= d^2
D= 13
There is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
For the nutritionist to determine whether there is an association between where food is prepared and the number of calories the food contains, there must be an association between two categorical variables.
The conditions that satisfy whether there exists an association between conditional relative frequencies are:
1. When there is a bigger difference in the conditional relative frequencies, the stronger the association between the variables.
2. When the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables.
For the given conditional relative frequency, we can see that there exists a significant difference between the columns of the table in the picture because 0.15 is significantly different from 0.55 and 0.85 is significantly different from 0.45
We can conclude that there is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
