1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
13

1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?

Law
1 answer:
Kaylis [27]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

You might be interested in
Normally, both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

It should be noted that in contract law, a discharge will take place when the parties that are involved have fully performed their duties. Therefore, it's <u>true.</u>

Discharge of a contract simply takes place when the main obligations of a contract end. It should be noted that the ending of the contract entails the termination of the contractual relationship.

Both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual obligations. Therefore, the operation of law releases the parties from performance.

Learn more about contracts on:

brainly.com/question/25820002

3 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Provide two examples of real-life instances where you engaged in an error in reasoning and, as a result, came to a faulty conclu
Molodets [167]

Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:

1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.

2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.

<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>

A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.

If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.

Learn more about faulty conclusions here:

brainly.com/question/2141635

5 0
2 years ago
he majority of today’s alarm systems rely on ___________ as their method of signal transmission, despite their unreliability.
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

noise

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who are the banana bots and what does the link do ?????
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

Banana boat was a descriptive nickname given to fast ships (also called banana carriers) engaged in the banana trade, which were designed to transport

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The legislative system is given powers granted to it by the Constitution in_________.
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how a case gets from trial court to the supreme court.
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone please defined “forfeiture”and the types
    13·1 answer
  • Assess how the media is supposed to exercise its roles and RESPONSIBILIES in reporting on human right violation in a democracy
    7·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    12·1 answer
  • Which numbered pair of phrases best completes this diagram of the
    14·2 answers
  • ⦁ Libby, a sophomore at a small rural high school, has dreams of becoming a journalist. However, her school lacks the funding fo
    9·1 answer
  • All crimes must first be tried by which entity?
    10·2 answers
  • In lucy v. zehmer, the two parties were drinking in a bar when lucy offered to buy zehmer's farm.
    13·1 answer
  • Are women more ethical than men in the workplace? What are the ethics underlying your decision? Support your answer with reason.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!