1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
2 years ago
13

1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?

Law
1 answer:
Kaylis [27]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

You might be interested in
You are driving along the interstate highway headed for a ballgame in a nearby city. A state highway patrol car suddenly appears
motikmotik

Answer:

State Circuit Court.

This is because speed driving or driving above the speed limit is a minor offence that need not be dealt in a federal, higher court and can be easily taken care of by the lower state courts.

Explanation:

The State Circuit Court is an intermediate level court where local and limited jurisdiction cases are heard. These courts are the court systems that deal with cases that are not serious enough to be tried in the higher courts. They are also known as state courts.

In the scenario of being pulled over at the interstate by a state highway patrol car for speed driving or driving above the limit, the summons will be heard in a circuit court. This is because the case is just a minor one as compared to more serious offenses, which makes it eligible to be tried in a lower court rather than at the federal level.

8 0
2 years ago
Lethal force is limited to the use of a firearm.<br> A. True<br> B. False
patriot [66]

Answer:

B. false

,.............

....,

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a letter in the business and id esomg eomd fdsj fe
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

Yamato's here!

Explanation:

There is many letters in a business. Some are VERY important. Like this one letter here that I got this morning:

        Dear enemy,

I do not like you at all, so please do not talk to me. If you do then I will send you this picture but in a different style.

                                                                                     Hate, Your enemy.

(^ - ^ "/) Xoxo, Yamato-

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the Constitutional issue in the Fisher case? How do you think the Court should decide? Explain your answer.
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

Fisher sued the University and argued that the use of race as a consideration in the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the University's admissions process was constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed.

7 0
2 years ago
Peacemaking criminology argues that (1)_____ is deeply rooted in the concept of(2)______
kirill115 [55]
1. violence
2. greed
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Facts on karsales v wallis case​
    14·1 answer
  • Gina is 15 and lives in Oklahoma with her parents and 2 siblings who are fiancially well and no abuse or problems whatsoever. Gi
    9·1 answer
  • (DO NOT GIVE FALSE ANSWERS)
    7·2 answers
  • Why is it difficult for a bill to become a law?
    11·1 answer
  • List the four ways to become a business owner.
    14·2 answers
  • What do you do when your grouned?
    10·1 answer
  • During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he wa
    5·1 answer
  • I need Help with This
    11·1 answer
  • Who should you contact if you have trouble making payments.
    8·1 answer
  • Alcohol first affects the area of the brain that controls
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!