Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
Answer:
Toda sociedad se construye sobre las bases de distintos valores morales y éticos que contribuyen a establecer como modelos idílicos los ideales de justicia, seguridad, solidaridad y esfuerzo.
Si bien muchos de los valores establecidos por la sociedad son en la práctica inalcanzables por las distintas circunstancias sociales y personales de cada individuo, lo socialmente esperado es que las personas intenten a través de sus acciones colaborar para que dichos valores sean mantenidos, o al menos no corromperlos con acciones negativas como delitos o contravenciones.
Por ello, dejar de lado el egoísmo y actuar siguiendo un principio moral de justicia es necesario para contribuir con el bienestar social de un grupo de personas determinado.
Answer:
There is actually a law which says that
"A person cannot be tried on to a court for the same case"
But in this situation the date and time is different and thus can be classified as a different case and also can be tried on to a court
Hope it helps
Can you please go into further detail about your question?
