I don't know if I did it right but here's my guess. I think you multiply 7 by 20% and that gives you 1.40 as a result. Compared to the other method I used (division), I'm pretty sure I'm right since the other result was 35. Doesn't make sense if the end amount was $7.
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
16 19 21 26 27 29 34 35 35 39 40 41 42 50 50 52 57 60 75 76 78 81 84
the data is already arranged in ascending order
Min=16
Max=84
The quartiles for the odd set of data is given by

where n is the number of elements
Here, n=23

Q1=6 th term
Q1=29
Q2=12 th term
Q2=41
Q3=18 th term
Q3=60
Hence, five-number summary for the given data is:
Min Q1 Q2 Q3 Max
16 29 41 60 84
Answer:
Opt A and D
Step-by-step explanation:
65% is 100 based number, this means that 65% is the same as 65/100, or 0,65.
65% of 20 is obtained performing the following operation:
0,65 * 20
or
65*20/100
Any of them
U can find the unit rate by looking where is the point so in that pic the unit rate I see is: 3/5
I believe the given limit is
![\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty} \bigg(\sqrt[3]{3x^3+3x^2+x-1} - \sqrt[3]{3x^3-x^2+1}\bigg)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Clim_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cbigg%28%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%5E3%2B3x%5E2%2Bx-1%7D%20-%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%5E3-x%5E2%2B1%7D%5Cbigg%29)
Let

Now rewrite the expression as a difference of cubes:

Then

The limit is then equivalent to

From each remaining cube root expression, remove the cubic terms:



Now that we see each term in the denominator has a factor of <em>x</em> ², we can eliminate it :


As <em>x</em> goes to infinity, each of the 1/<em>x</em> ⁿ terms converge to 0, leaving us with the overall limit,
