This would be difficult to specify for you because you did not provide the genotype of the other parent. However, there are limitations to the possible combinations, so I will do each to help you out.
<u>1st possibility:</u>
<u>B B</u>
B BB BB
b Bb Bb
Brown eyes: 4 out of 4 or 100%
Blue eyes: 0 out of 4 or 0%.
<u>2nd possibility:</u>
<u>B b</u>
B BB Bb
b Bb bb
Brown eyes: 3 out of 4 or 75%
Blue eyes: 1 out of 4 or 25%.
<u>3rd possibility:</u>
<u>b b</u>
B Bb Bb
b bb bb
Brown eyes: 2 out of 4 or 50%
Blue eyes: 2 out of 4 or 50%.
<u>As long as there is a capital letter in the genotype, the dominant trait will come out. So if the combination is </u><u>Bb or BB</u><u>, then </u><u>BROWN </u><u>in this case will come out. The only time </u><u>BLUE eyes </u><u>will come out is if has two recessives in its genotype or </u><u>bb.</u>
En una solución acuosa donde el agua es el solvente, el soluto que será disuelto por el agua tiene menos partículas, lo que hace que las partículas se muevan en un movimiento aleatorio. El agua pura tiene una baja concentración de iones y, por lo tanto, no conduce electricidad.
Answer:
²⁵ Mg = 10.00%
²⁶ Mg = 11.0%
Explanation:
Given that:
Magnesium ²⁴Mg has an abundance of 78.99%
Hence, (100 - 78.99)% = 21.01%
21.01% is the abundance of ²⁵ Mg and ²⁶ Mg
Suppose,
²⁵ Mg = x
²⁶ Mg = (21.01 - x)%
Then;
avg. atomic mass = 
where the avg. atomic mass = 24.3050
∴
2430.5 = 2440.46915 -0.9968 x
0.9968x = 2440.46915 - 2430.5
0.9968x = 9.96915
x = 9.96915/0.9968
x = 10.00%
∴ Recall that:
²⁵ Mg = x
²⁶ Mg = (21.01 - x)%
²⁵ Mg = 10.00%
²⁶ Mg = (21.01 - 10.00)%
²⁶ Mg = 11.0%
Answer:
higher costs, energy use and carbon emissions
Explanation:
not sure if this is right or not, I apologize if this is wrong
Answer:
1.728 mol /(L*min)
Explanation:
Hello,
In the attached photo, you'll find the numerical procedure for your question.
- Take into account that the negative sign is eligible for reagents and positive for products.
Best regards!
