1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
3 years ago
12

How was the great compromise an effective agreement?

History
1 answer:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
4 0

The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house, but required the upper house to be weighted equally between the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house.

You might be interested in
Lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons. What part of the trial process does this des
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

The case is in the jury selection phase, and the trial will follow.

Explanation:

From the question we are informed about a scenerio whereby Lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons. The part of the trial process this describe jury selection phase and the trial will follow. During this jury selection phase, Lawyers as well as judges will proceed with selection of juries, which is “voir dire,” process, and it implies truth speaking, some questions will be asked from the potential jurors by the judge and attorneys,the question is to know their competency of serving in the case, then the next thing that will follow is the trial

5 0
2 years ago
Early Christianity grew out of the beliefs, practices, and values of which early people?
nevsk [136]
I think the Jews since they had a lot of similar beliefs.
6 0
3 years ago
In 1878, the Supreme Court denied George Reynolds right to practice bigamy which is a part of his Mormon religion. Why was Mr. R
enyata [817]

The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.

Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.

Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.

8 0
3 years ago
HELP 10 POINTS
Dennis_Churaev [7]

North America

is the most related terms

7 0
2 years ago
Graphic Organizer
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

INformation please ?

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7. What was De Witt Clinton's contribution to water travel?
    6·1 answer
  • Why are there several ethnic variations of the 2005 mypyramid?
    15·1 answer
  • HELP A GIRL OUT!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Was the Vietnam war winnable
    8·2 answers
  • Exploration Day 3 Quiz
    8·1 answer
  • Those who supported the free silver movement​
    5·1 answer
  • 1. define economic policy without using the word economic. provide 1 example of and economic policy.
    13·1 answer
  • What are some differences between Muslims and Christianity ?
    11·1 answer
  • This tragic event in New York City in 1911, led to the horrific deaths of nearly 150 people, mostly young immigrant women who co
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Why is reputation important when it comes to lending and borrowing?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!