1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
2 years ago
12

How was the great compromise an effective agreement?

History
1 answer:
Oliga [24]2 years ago
4 0

The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house, but required the upper house to be weighted equally between the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house.

You might be interested in
What is the event that brought the Era of Good Feelings to an end
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

Loss of Republican Party discipline, the Panic of 1819, the Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland , and the Missouri Crisis of 1820 all contributed to the decline in the political consensus—leading to the end of the “Era of Good Feelings.”

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does article i section 32 of the texas constitution differ from the decision in the united states v. Windsor case?
serious [3.7K]

The correct answer is A. Article i section 32 of the texas constitution applies to residents of the state of texas while the windsor case applies only to gay and lesbian couples on the federal level.

Through the Windsor case, the United States Supreme Court established that restricting the U.S federal interpretation of "marriage" to apply only opposite-sex couples is unconstitutional. This ruling applies across the nation, while the article i section 32 of the Texas constitution, that limits the definition of marriage to only opposite-sex unions, applies only in Texas.

7 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the middle colonies and southern colonies during the restoration era.
boyakko [2]

Both the Southern and Middle Colonies had fertile farmlands, but only the Middle Colonies was able to provide trading opportunities, thanks to their coastal lowland and bay-provided harbors. Southern Colonies highly contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo. Slaves cultivate huge tracts of land and plantations owned by wealthy aristocrats and large landowners. On the other hand, Middle Colonies were more suitable for growing grain and livestock, with its environment ideal for small to large farms. More diverse workforce also exists in the Middle Colonies, consisting of farmers, fisherman, and merchants. Another notable contrast between the two colonies is that, for the people of the South, life developed as rough and rural while people of the Middle countries are deeply connected to the Church and village community. 

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which issue did not cause arguments at the Constitutional Convention?
givi [52]
It would be "d. monarchy vs. representative government," that did not cause arguments at the Constitutional Convention, since all of the representatives knew that there should be a representative government of some sort. <span />
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the relationship between Jim Crow Laws and the court case "Plessy Vs Ferguson"
xxTIMURxx [149]

Jim Crow Laws enforced segregation between black and white people. The court case "Plessy Vs Ferguson" was trying to please people by enforcing the "separate but equal" law. Basically, they wanted to make the two races separate, but they thought it would be fine as long as both places were the same in quality and quantity.


To sum it up, Jim Crow Laws were to separate the two, but black people were given schools that weren't as good, trashy bathrooms, etc. It was also made to make sure that black people could not go some places on certain days, or at all. The "Plessy vs Ferguson" case was to try to make it better by separating the races, but having both bathrooms the same and both schools the same so none is better than the other.


I hope I helped.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which culture group lived in the Southeast region?
    12·1 answer
  • what role did the diversity of the American population play in Woodrow Wilson’s decision to remain neutral during the first year
    8·1 answer
  • Explain how the traditional incorporation of slaves into households and the export of slaves to the Mediterranean and the Indian
    9·1 answer
  • Which organization helped back the United States during the Korean War?
    9·1 answer
  • What natural features served as the northern border for Christian expansion by A.D.500? Please answer!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Which sentence is true about the early settlers in the Americas?
    10·2 answers
  • According to President Wilson, what should unite Americans?
    8·2 answers
  • When &amp; how did General Washington win battles at Trenton &amp; Princeton ?
    11·1 answer
  • When future historians examine our contemporary age, they will likely be perplexed by many things. Of course, change is a consta
    9·1 answer
  • Write at least 3 sentences explaining how the Social Contract, Magna
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!