All categories

3 years ago

CAN you help me on this!!!!pls

Mathematics

2 answers:

Elanso [62]3 years ago

5 0

GRETA :

75 + (45 x 1) = 120

$120

RICHARD :

You read it of the graph and it’s at $80

STEVE :

165 / 3 = 55

$55

Reasoning :

Greta earns the most money per hour as she earns $120 whereas everyone else earns under $100.

gogolik [260]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: Geeta earned 390 for 7hours

Step-by-step explanation:

p = Pay

Geeta: for 7hours

p = 75 + 45(h)

p = 75 + 45(7)

p = 390

Richard: for 7hours

According to the graph

1hr = 80

2hr = 110

3hr = 140

4hr = 170

5hr = 200

6hr = 230

7hr = 260

Steve: for 7hours

385

You might be interested in

If the ratio of the sides of two squares is 3:1, what is the ratio of their perimeters?

Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Ratio of the perimeters =3:1

Step-by-step explanation:

We have given that : Ratio of the sides of two squares is 3:1

To find : Ratio of their perimeters

Solution : Let the length of the sides are 3:1 = 3x : x

Formula of perimeter of square = 4(side)

Using the formula ,

Perimeter of 1 square = 4×3x= 12x

Perimeter of 2 square = 4×x= 4x

Ratio of the perimeter of 1 square and 2 square = 12x : 4x

= 3 : 1

8 0

3 years ago

What is the slope of the line through the points (0,-3) and (2,1)?

Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

alright so you got 2 points! now this is the slope formula! y2-y1/x2-x1

okay let's label your points! (x1 0,y1 -3) (x2 2,y2 1)

let's follow the formula this makes it so we can solve! 1--3/2-0

I understand you may get a decimal but don't use 2.5 use a fraction because teachers seem to like fractions and general decimals can be hard to use (experience lol) 2.5 is 5/2 so this means your slope is 5/2

this formula works every single time and if you memorize it you can do any other problems with 2 points! please memorize y2-y1/x2-x1

6 0

2 years ago

1-69.

timofeeve [1]

The question above was not written properly

Complete Question

Lacey and Haley are rewriting expressions in an equivalent, simpler form.

a. Haley simplified x³⋅ x² and got

x⁵

Lacey simplified x³ + x² and got the same result! However, their teacher told them that only one simplification is correct. Who simplified correctly and how do you know?

b. Haley simplifies 3⁵⋅ 4⁵ and gets the result 12^10, but Lacey is not sure.

Is Haley correct? Be sure to justify your answer.

Answer:

a) Haley is correct, Lacey simplified wrongly.

b) Haley is incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Haley simplified x³⋅ x² and got

x⁵

Lacey simplified x³ + x² and got the same result! However, their teacher told them that only one simplification is correct. Who simplified correctly and how do you know?

For Question a, when it comes to simplifying algebraic expression that has to do with powers, there are certain rules that should be followed.

For example

x^a × x^b = x^(a + b)

For Haley, she simplified x³⋅ x² and got

x⁵

She is correct because this follows the product rule of powers or exponents above

= x³⋅ x² = x³+² = x⁵

For Lacey she is wrong because:

x³ + x² ≠ x⁵

x³ + x² when simplified as quadratic equation = x²(x + 1)

b. Haley simplifies 3⁵⋅ 4⁵ and gets the result 12^10, but Lacey is not sure.

Is Haley correct? Be sure to justify your answer.

For question b, when we have two distinct or different numbers with the same power(exponents) the rule states that:

x^a × y^a = (x × y)^a = (xy)^a

Haley is simplified wrongly. She did not apply the rule above

Haley simplified 3⁵⋅ 4⁵ = (3 × 4) ⁵+⁵

= 12^10, this is wrong.

The correct answer according to the rule =

3⁵⋅ 4⁵ = (3 × 4) ⁵ = 12⁵

Therefore,

3⁵⋅ 4⁵ ≠ 12^10

3⁵⋅ 4⁵ = 12⁵

Haley is wrong.

3 0

3 years ago

National data indicates that 35% of households own a desktop computer. In a random sample of 570 households, 40% owned a deskt

Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

Yes, this provide enough evidence to show a difference in the proportion of households that own a desktop.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that National data indicates that 35% of households own a desktop computer.

In a random sample of 570 households, 40% owned a desktop computer.

Let p = population proportion of households who own a desktop computer

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : p = 25% {means that 35% of households own a desktop computer}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : p $\neq$ 25% {means that % of households who own a desktop computer is different from 35%}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{\hat p-p}{{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } } } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p$ = sample proportion of 570 households who owned a desktop computer = 40%

n = sample of households = 570

So, test statistics = $\frac{0.40-0.35}{{\sqrt{\frac{0.40(1-0.40)}{570} } } } }$

= 2.437

Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance at which to test out hypothesis so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 5% significance level, the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test. Since our test statistics doesn't lies within the range of critical values of z so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that % of households who own a desktop computer is different from 35%.

3 0

3 years ago

Which is the largest interval over which the function shown in the table is increasing?

vova2212 [387]

Answer:

x < 0

Step-by-step explanation:

If you were to graph the function, you would get a parabola that opens down with the vertex at (0, 0). So, the graph is increasing from -∞ to 0.

3 0

3 years ago