Answer: Most economists are not concerned that natural resources will eventually limit economic growth. As evidence, they note that the prices of most natural resources, adjusted for overall inflation, have tended to fall over time.
Explanation: Natural resources have fallen overtime because of the increase in technological uses and processes. Due the having the ability to man-make items, the scarcity of a natural resource not being available isn't as concerning.
The great agreement, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, settled the question of participation, which threatened to derail the entire constitutional convention.
<h3>What is constitutional convention?</h3>
Constitutional Convention, refers to the meeting held for making the constitution of the particular country. It provides the guidelines regarding the fundamental law of the country.
The Connecticut Compromise is the deal that resolved the participation issue that threatened to destroy the whole constitutional convention. It provides the equal representation of the house of representative and senates.
Therefore, it can be concluded that Connecticut Compromise is settled the question of participation.
Learn more about Constitutional Convention here:
brainly.com/question/14303096
#SPJ4
Explanation:
<em><u>Bitcoin is a digital currency which operates free of any central control or the oversight of banks or governments. Instead it relies on peer-to-peer software and cryptography. A public ledger records all bitcoin transactions and copies are held on servers around the world</u></em>
<u>Answer:</u>
The Norman invasion in the year 1066 is considered to be very significant because it changed England in many ways. This linked England even more with the continent of Europe. It created one of the most strong monarchies in Europe and resulted in the impact and hold of Scandinavian to weaken a lot. This invasion changed the English traditions and language and there were some influence of language of France and it's culture.
Well let's start with theft. Just because the keys are there doesn't mean that's an open invitation to take something.
Then there's the business of driving
- without a licence
- with no insurance
- with no name on the registration.
What do you think? Does that go beyond unruly or mischievous? And these are just general considerations. Wait till insurance gets into it. In come cases they may not pay. So now what?
Four general counts and more to come from the lawyers who deal with this sort of thing all the time. I would say that 14 year old better start worrying a bit.
