If 5 biscuits cost 40p
1 biscuit would cost (40p divided by 5) 8p
8p multiplied by 3 (to get 3 biscuits) would cost 24p
3 biscuits cost 24p
9514 1404 393
Answer:
150 Wh
Step-by-step explanation:
We know the energy per bulb is 10 Wh per hour, so the total energy used by 3 bulbs in 5 hours is ...
(10 Wh/(bulb·hour))×(3 bulbs)×(5 hours) = 10·3·5 Wh = 150 Wh
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Lol I think it’s 38 I mean yeah right? It says thirty eight years ago which means he talking about the present
This should help
https://math.tutorvista.com/geometry/surface-area-of-a-trapezoidal-prism.html?view=simple
