The authors of this editorial is against women’s rights to vote. According to the text, the author stated that “Without the counsel and guidance of men, no woman ever ruled a state wisely or well.” This suggests that the author did not think that women can be smart on these topics. The author also stated, “A characteristic they were born with.” “That they lack the genius of politics.” You can tell that the authors strongly believe that women do not have the skill and genius that men do and that they were born with it and it isn't “curable.” (as they said.) In the first paragraph, they also stated that women suffrage would result horribly for the government and weaken it, as well as for society. Throughout the short article, the beliefs the authors had can be summarized as women not being smart enough, unlike men, and the women suffrage is ridiculous and unnecessary.( please mark as brainliest and 5 stars I really tried!)
The Ibo
<span>the Hausa (Muslim) and the most numerous of the tribal groups </span>
<span>the Yoruba (the ones with the most power in terms of the government.).
I think this is right
</span>
Japan was coerced by the powerful United States military (that’s the answer)
Explanation:
During the Reconstruction period of 1865–1877, federal law provided civil rights protection in the U.S. South for freedmen,
the African as a result of elections in which paramilitary groups intimidated opponents, attacking blacks or preventing them from voting.
