B. Most nations had one primary religion.
The Reformation had occurred in the 16th century (the 1500s). By 1600, the positions had solidified, and nations typically were of one religious position or another. Italy, France and Spain and certain other states remained staunchly Roman Catholic. Most of the German states had become Lutheran, as had Scandinavian countries. England had established the Church of England, its own brand of Protestantism. Many cantons in Switzerland had become enclaves of Calvinism. There wasn't much of a notion yet of religious diversity within the same community or society. Each principality or territory tended to have one official religion operating in it.
King => Nobles => Free citizens => Soldiers/Civil Service => Slaves.
Three main social classes included the awilu (free persons), the wardu (slaves), and the mushkenu (free persons of low estate).
As a punishment, free persons could be forced into slavery. Parents of children could also be sold into slavery.
Babylonians based the structure of their society around their own religious beliefs and how they will prosper. They were ruthless people who conquered many nations through force. Some accounts even state that the Babylonians would kill entire civilizations, even if the civilization had surrendered without any sort of resistance.
Wich one if us growing econmy and diversity
Answer:
ok so the first one is the supremacy clause (that's not all of article 6, it says more about states rights). it means that any laws on the national level trump the ones on the state level.
the second one is the 10th amendment, which says that states can do whatever isn't prohibited by the constitution (and other amendments), not just what is specifically said they can do.
this basically shows the power balance between the national government and states government. the national government is always supreme over state governments, but state governments still do stuff. that's what federalism is.
As head of a political party<span> the </span>president<span> uses his power and prestige to support party goals or candidates.</span>
