Answer:
Fall
Explanation:
hope this helps.................
Wow that's really interesting can you send some more facts
Answer:
without sufficient metal to make things such as axes and saws we would have never made anything out of wood and be stuck living in mud huts and the like
Explanation:
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
The North Vietnamese<span> government and the Viet Cong were fighting to reunify </span>Vietnam<span>. They viewed the conflict as a colonial </span>war<span> and a continuation of the First Indochina </span>War<span> against forces from France and later on the U.S. ... Beginning in 1950, American military advisors arrived in what was then French Indochina.</span>
