- A Loyalist who opposed war with Britain.
- The United States' first Episcopal bishop.
<h3>
Who was Samuel Seabury?</h3>
- Samuel Seabury (November 30, 1729 – February 25, 1796) was the first American Episcopal bishop, the Episcopal Church's second Presiding Bishop, and the first Bishop of Connecticut.
- During the American Revolution, he was a prominent Loyalist in New York City and a renowned opponent of Alexander Hamilton.
- In 1729, he was born in North Groton (later renamed Ledyard), Connecticut, in a home that is now a Historic Landmark on the corner of Church Hill Road and Spicer Hill Road in Ledyard, Connecticut.
- Samuel Seabury (1706-1764), his father, was a Congregationalist clergyman in Groton before becoming a deacon and priest in the Church of England in 1730.
Therefore, what describes Seabury is:
- A Loyalist who opposed war with Britain.
- The United States' first Episcopal bishop.
Know more about Samuel Seabury here:
brainly.com/question/12860357
#SPJ4
Commodore Perry's arrival in Japan in 1853 resulted in factors that led to the collapse of the Tokugawa Shogunate. The anti-foreign sentiment was directed against the shogun as well as against foreigners in Japan. The Satsuma and Choshu clans united to bring down the shogun, and in 1867, they did so.
i believe the answer is C. Greek history! But you may want to double check first! As im not too sure.
Answer:
hi here's ur answer
Deterrence theory is the idea that an inferior force, by virtue of the destructive power of the force's weapons, could deter a more powerful adversary, provided that this force could be protected against destruction by a surprise attack. This doctrine gained increased prominence as a military strategy during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons and is related to, but distinct from, the concept of Mutual assured destruction, which models the preventative nature of full-scale nuclear attack that would devastate both parties in a nuclear war.
Explanation:
A is the answer. The Supreme Court can rule laws and regulations unconstitutional.
