What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Direct quotations
Summary of a discussion
Information
Writer constructs a diagram from data provided by others
Rule of thumb is that if it is from someone else and not your own mind, you should document it.
I am sure the answer is B.
Against because younger people playing tackle football may get hurt
The phrase that describes one way to determine if a source is credible is:
- Confirm that the author is well-educated on the subject
<h3>What is Credibility?</h3>
Credibility in writing refers to the right of an individual to speak on a subject matter. If an author has little knowledge and experience in a particular field, then they do not have the credibility to talk about that subject.
Experience and knowledge are vital factors to check when measuring credibility.
Learn more about credibility here:
brainly.com/question/1279931
#SPJ1
